Correlation
The correlation between ET and WMB is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
ET vs. WMB
Compare and contrast key facts about Energy Transfer LP (ET) and The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ET or WMB.
Performance
ET vs. WMB - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
ET:
0.77
WMB:
2.10
ET:
1.21
WMB:
2.53
ET:
1.17
WMB:
1.36
ET:
0.88
WMB:
4.50
ET:
2.70
WMB:
11.68
ET:
7.97%
WMB:
4.69%
ET:
27.54%
WMB:
26.33%
ET:
-87.81%
WMB:
-98.04%
ET:
-14.11%
WMB:
-1.77%
Fundamentals
ET:
$60.67B
WMB:
$73.88B
ET:
$1.31
WMB:
$1.87
ET:
13.34
WMB:
32.36
ET:
0.82
WMB:
2.61
ET:
0.74
WMB:
6.67
ET:
1.72
WMB:
5.91
ET:
$82.06B
WMB:
$10.91B
ET:
$15.84B
WMB:
$7.07B
ET:
$15.57B
WMB:
$5.96B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ET achieves a -7.58% return, which is significantly lower than WMB's 12.81% return. Over the past 10 years, ET has underperformed WMB with an annualized return of 1.71%, while WMB has yielded a comparatively higher 7.80% annualized return.
ET
-7.58%
7.78%
-8.84%
20.09%
24.55%
26.96%
1.71%
WMB
12.81%
2.91%
5.23%
51.68%
23.58%
31.37%
7.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ET vs. WMB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ET
WMB
ET vs. WMB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Transfer LP (ET) and The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
ET vs. WMB - Dividend Comparison
ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, more than WMB's 3.18% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ET Energy Transfer LP | 7.41% | 6.51% | 8.96% | 7.33% | 7.44% | 17.28% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% | 2.61% |
WMB The Williams Companies, Inc. | 3.18% | 3.51% | 5.14% | 5.17% | 6.30% | 7.98% | 6.41% | 6.17% | 3.94% | 5.39% | 9.53% | 4.36% |
Drawdowns
ET vs. WMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ET drawdown since its inception was -87.81%, smaller than the maximum WMB drawdown of -98.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ET and WMB.
Loading data...
Volatility
ET vs. WMB - Volatility Comparison
Energy Transfer LP (ET) has a higher volatility of 9.56% compared to The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) at 6.31%. This indicates that ET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
ET vs. WMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Transfer LP and The Williams Companies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ET vs. WMB - Profitability Comparison
ET - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 4.08B and revenue of 21.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.4%.
WMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, The Williams Companies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.43B and revenue of 3.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.8%.
ET - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.49B and revenue of 21.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.
WMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, The Williams Companies, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.09B and revenue of 3.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.9%.
ET - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.32B and revenue of 21.02B, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.
WMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, The Williams Companies, Inc. reported a net income of 691.00M and revenue of 3.05B, resulting in a net margin of 22.7%.