ET vs. WMB
Compare and contrast key facts about Energy Transfer LP (ET) and The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ET or WMB.
Correlation
The correlation between ET and WMB is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ET vs. WMB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ET:
3.39
WMB:
4.10
ET:
4.64
WMB:
4.98
ET:
1.59
WMB:
1.67
ET:
2.99
WMB:
6.71
ET:
26.80
WMB:
25.99
ET:
2.23%
WMB:
3.15%
ET:
17.64%
WMB:
19.93%
ET:
-87.81%
WMB:
-98.04%
ET:
0.00%
WMB:
-0.14%
Fundamentals
ET:
$69.47B
WMB:
$70.71B
ET:
$1.36
WMB:
$2.36
ET:
14.92
WMB:
24.58
ET:
0.70
WMB:
9.72
ET:
$63.13B
WMB:
$7.90B
ET:
$9.12B
WMB:
$4.26B
ET:
$11.50B
WMB:
$5.08B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ET achieves a 3.57% return, which is significantly lower than WMB's 9.28% return. Over the past 10 years, ET has underperformed WMB with an annualized return of 5.70%, while WMB has yielded a comparatively higher 9.75% annualized return.
ET
3.57%
11.48%
28.28%
60.31%
18.84%
5.70%
WMB
9.28%
13.71%
37.02%
82.54%
27.26%
9.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ET vs. WMB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ET
WMB
ET vs. WMB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Transfer LP (ET) and The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ET vs. WMB - Dividend Comparison
ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.29%, more than WMB's 3.21% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ET Energy Transfer LP | 6.29% | 6.51% | 8.96% | 7.33% | 7.44% | 17.28% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% | 2.61% |
WMB The Williams Companies, Inc. | 3.21% | 3.51% | 5.14% | 5.17% | 6.30% | 7.98% | 6.41% | 6.17% | 3.94% | 5.39% | 9.53% | 4.36% |
Drawdowns
ET vs. WMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ET drawdown since its inception was -87.81%, smaller than the maximum WMB drawdown of -98.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ET and WMB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ET vs. WMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Energy Transfer LP (ET) is 6.43%, while The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) has a volatility of 7.28%. This indicates that ET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ET vs. WMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Transfer LP and The Williams Companies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities