PortfoliosLab logo
ET vs. EQT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ET and EQT is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

ET vs. EQT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Energy Transfer LP (ET) and EQT Corporation (EQT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ET:

0.78

EQT:

0.99

Sortino Ratio

ET:

1.23

EQT:

1.47

Omega Ratio

ET:

1.17

EQT:

1.20

Calmar Ratio

ET:

0.89

EQT:

0.82

Martin Ratio

ET:

2.84

EQT:

3.31

Ulcer Index

ET:

7.73%

EQT:

11.43%

Daily Std Dev

ET:

27.60%

EQT:

37.58%

Max Drawdown

ET:

-87.81%

EQT:

-91.50%

Current Drawdown

ET:

-11.56%

EQT:

-1.42%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ET:

$61.60B

EQT:

$33.44B

EPS

ET:

$1.32

EQT:

$0.61

PE Ratio

ET:

13.60

EQT:

91.57

PEG Ratio

ET:

0.80

EQT:

0.54

PS Ratio

ET:

0.75

EQT:

5.43

PB Ratio

ET:

1.74

EQT:

1.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

ET:

$82.06B

EQT:

$6.34B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ET:

$15.84B

EQT:

$3.11B

EBITDA (TTM)

ET:

$15.57B

EQT:

$3.35B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ET achieves a -4.83% return, which is significantly lower than EQT's 21.21% return. Over the past 10 years, ET has underperformed EQT with an annualized return of 1.76%, while EQT has yielded a comparatively higher 2.26% annualized return.


ET

YTD

-4.83%

1M

6.23%

6M

6.05%

1Y

21.42%

3Y*

27.81%

5Y*

27.30%

10Y*

1.76%

EQT

YTD

21.21%

1M

9.31%

6M

26.22%

1Y

37.02%

3Y*

12.56%

5Y*

34.55%

10Y*

2.26%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Energy Transfer LP

EQT Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ET vs. EQT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ET
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ET is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ET is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ET is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ET is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ET is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ET is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

EQT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EQT is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EQT is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EQT is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EQT is 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EQT is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EQT is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ET vs. EQT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Transfer LP (ET) and EQT Corporation (EQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ET Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is comparable to the EQT Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ET and EQT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

ET vs. EQT - Dividend Comparison

ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.20%, more than EQT's 1.13% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ET
Energy Transfer LP
7.20%6.51%8.96%7.33%7.44%17.28%9.51%9.24%6.66%5.90%7.42%2.61%
EQT
EQT Corporation
1.13%1.37%1.57%1.63%0.00%0.24%1.10%83.99%0.24%0.21%0.26%0.18%

Drawdowns

ET vs. EQT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ET drawdown since its inception was -87.81%, roughly equal to the maximum EQT drawdown of -91.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ET and EQT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

ET vs. EQT - Volatility Comparison

Energy Transfer LP (ET) and EQT Corporation (EQT) have volatilities of 11.42% and 11.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ET vs. EQT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Transfer LP and EQT Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20212022202320242025
21.02B
2.42B
(ET) Total Revenue
(EQT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ET vs. EQT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Energy Transfer LP and EQT Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-60.0%-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
19.4%
70.7%
(ET) Gross Margin
(EQT) Gross Margin
ET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 4.08B and revenue of 21.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.4%.

EQT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, EQT Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.71B and revenue of 2.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.7%.

ET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.49B and revenue of 21.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.

EQT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, EQT Corporation reported an operating income of 496.25M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.5%.

ET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.32B and revenue of 21.02B, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.

EQT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, EQT Corporation reported a net income of 242.14M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in a net margin of 10.0%.