ET vs. EQT

In the year-to-date period, ET achieves a -9.48% return, which is significantly lower than EQT's 9.28% return. Over the past 10 years, ET has outperformed EQT with an annualized return of 1.76%, while EQT has yielded a comparatively lower 1.03% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Transfer LP (ET) and EQT Corporation (EQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ET Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is comparable to the EQT Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ET and EQT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.37%, more than EQT's 1.27% yield.

The maximum ET drawdown since its inception was -87.81%, roughly equal to the maximum EQT drawdown of -91.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ET and EQT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Energy Transfer LP (ET) is 16.28%, while EQT Corporation (EQT) has a volatility of 17.44%. This indicates that ET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Transfer LP and EQT Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.