ET vs. EQT
Compare and contrast key facts about Energy Transfer LP (ET) and EQT Corporation (EQT).
Performance
ET vs. EQT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ET vs. EQT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ET Energy Transfer LP | 19.24% | -9.37% | 53.87% | 27.87% | 55.74% | 42.96% | -44.92% | 5.88% | -17.74% | -4.66% |
EQT EQT Corporation | 19.07% | 17.64% | 21.41% | 16.20% | 57.64% | 71.60% | 17.27% | -41.82% | -38.82% | -12.80% |
Fundamentals
ET:
$70.45B
EQT:
$39.75B
ET:
$1.37
EQT:
$3.30
ET:
14.10
EQT:
19.30
ET:
0.84
EQT:
4.55
ET:
1.44
EQT:
1.67
ET:
$82.63B
EQT:
$8.64B
ET:
$18.01B
EQT:
$8.42B
ET:
$14.93B
EQT:
$5.89B
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ET having a 19.24% return and EQT slightly lower at 19.07%. Over the past 10 years, ET has outperformed EQT with an annualized return of 20.51%, while EQT has yielded a comparatively lower 6.68% annualized return.
ET
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- 2.44%
- YTD
- 19.24%
- 6M
- 16.88%
- 1Y
- 12.07%
- 3Y*
- 25.52%
- 5Y*
- 29.51%
- 10Y*
- 20.51%
EQT
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- 3.61%
- YTD
- 19.07%
- 6M
- 17.60%
- 1Y
- 20.52%
- 3Y*
- 27.75%
- 5Y*
- 29.08%
- 10Y*
- 6.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ET vs. EQT — Risk / Return Rank
ET
EQT
ET vs. EQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Transfer LP (ET) and EQT Corporation (EQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ET | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.51 | 0.57 | -0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.86 | 0.95 | -0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.13 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.65 | 1.17 | -0.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.82 | 2.31 | -0.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ET | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 | 0.57 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.17 | 0.67 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.14 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.32 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between ET and EQT is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ET vs. EQT - Dividend Comparison
ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.87%, more than EQT's 1.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ET Energy Transfer LP | 6.87% | 7.97% | 6.51% | 8.95% | 7.33% | 7.41% | 17.27% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% |
EQT EQT Corporation | 1.01% | 1.19% | 1.37% | 1.57% | 1.63% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 1.10% | 0.42% | 0.21% | 0.18% | 0.23% |
Drawdowns
ET vs. EQT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ET drawdown since its inception was -87.81%, roughly equal to the maximum EQT drawdown of -91.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ET and EQT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ET | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.81% | -91.51% | +3.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.33% | -18.39% | +1.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.82% | -42.56% | +16.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.82% | -88.28% | +15.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.88% | -6.32% | +4.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.95% | -23.38% | -2.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.24% | 9.29% | -3.05% |
Volatility
ET vs. EQT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Energy Transfer LP (ET) is 4.96%, while EQT Corporation (EQT) has a volatility of 8.04%. This indicates that ET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ET | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.96% | 8.04% | -3.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.68% | 23.63% | -11.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.80% | 35.89% | -12.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.48% | 43.78% | -18.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.63% | 48.95% | -12.32% |
Financials
ET vs. EQT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Transfer LP and EQT Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities