ET vs. EQT
Compare and contrast key facts about Energy Transfer LP (ET) and EQT Corporation (EQT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ET or EQT.
Correlation
The correlation between ET and EQT is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ET vs. EQT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ET:
2.17
EQT:
1.48
ET:
2.93
EQT:
2.14
ET:
1.39
EQT:
1.27
ET:
3.20
EQT:
1.11
ET:
17.66
EQT:
4.65
ET:
2.42%
EQT:
11.05%
ET:
19.66%
EQT:
33.26%
ET:
-87.81%
EQT:
-91.57%
ET:
-6.53%
EQT:
-9.88%
Fundamentals
ET:
$66.53B
EQT:
$30.02B
ET:
$1.28
EQT:
$0.45
ET:
15.15
EQT:
111.64
ET:
0.67
EQT:
0.37
ET:
$82.67B
EQT:
$5.22B
ET:
$13.13B
EQT:
$1.57B
ET:
$15.27B
EQT:
$2.88B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ET achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly lower than EQT's 9.28% return. Over the past 10 years, ET has outperformed EQT with an annualized return of 3.43%, while EQT has yielded a comparatively lower 1.93% annualized return.
ET
0.58%
-5.81%
24.31%
41.24%
20.22%
3.43%
EQT
9.28%
-5.64%
50.44%
36.84%
55.79%
1.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ET vs. EQT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ET
EQT
ET vs. EQT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Transfer LP (ET) and EQT Corporation (EQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ET vs. EQT - Dividend Comparison
ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.63%, more than EQT's 1.27% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ET Energy Transfer LP | 6.63% | 6.51% | 8.96% | 7.33% | 7.44% | 17.28% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% | 2.61% |
EQT EQT Corporation | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 1.10% | 83.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ET vs. EQT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ET drawdown since its inception was -87.81%, roughly equal to the maximum EQT drawdown of -91.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ET and EQT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ET vs. EQT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Energy Transfer LP (ET) is 9.27%, while EQT Corporation (EQT) has a volatility of 14.36%. This indicates that ET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ET vs. EQT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Transfer LP and EQT Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities