PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MVV vs. NOBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MVV vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MVV vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MVV
ProShares Ultra Midcap 400
4.75%3.48%17.75%22.51%-31.96%48.57%6.20%49.50%-25.44%30.81%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.32%6.84%6.72%8.09%-6.52%25.46%8.35%27.39%-3.26%21.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVV achieves a 4.75% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 2.32% return. Over the past 10 years, MVV has outperformed NOBL with an annualized return of 12.30%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively lower 9.54% annualized return.


MVV

1D
1.73%
1M
-11.15%
YTD
4.75%
6M
5.31%
1Y
24.57%
3Y*
14.18%
5Y*
3.91%
10Y*
12.30%

NOBL

1D
-0.04%
1M
-6.79%
YTD
2.32%
6M
4.06%
1Y
6.18%
3Y*
7.40%
5Y*
6.30%
10Y*
9.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MVV vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MVV vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVV
MVV Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
MVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVV Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVV Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVV vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MVVNOBLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.57

0.41

+0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.09

0.70

+0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.09

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

0.54

+0.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.72

1.89

+1.83

MVV vs. NOBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVV Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is higher than the NOBL Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVV and NOBL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MVVNOBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

0.41

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.44

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.58

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.64

-0.41

Correlation

The correlation between MVV and NOBL is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

MVV vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison

MVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than NOBL's 2.14% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MVV
ProShares Ultra Midcap 400
0.81%0.77%0.39%0.77%0.93%0.16%0.29%0.62%0.62%0.21%0.43%0.17%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.14%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%

Drawdowns

MVV vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVV drawdown since its inception was -85.54%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVV and NOBL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MVVNOBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.54%

-35.43%

-50.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.85%

-11.20%

-15.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.53%

-17.92%

-27.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.19%

-35.43%

-33.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.34%

-7.07%

-4.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.70%

-3.45%

-17.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.97%

3.18%

+3.79%

Volatility

MVV vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) has a higher volatility of 12.99% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 3.55%. This indicates that MVV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MVVNOBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.99%

3.55%

+9.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.02%

8.06%

+15.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.30%

15.24%

+28.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.66%

14.39%

+25.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.32%

16.59%

+25.73%