PortfoliosLab logo
MVV vs. UMDD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MVV and UMDD is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

MVV vs. UMDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MVV:

-0.06

UMDD:

-0.19

Sortino Ratio

MVV:

0.11

UMDD:

0.06

Omega Ratio

MVV:

1.01

UMDD:

1.01

Calmar Ratio

MVV:

-0.15

UMDD:

-0.27

Martin Ratio

MVV:

-0.40

UMDD:

-0.72

Ulcer Index

MVV:

16.47%

UMDD:

24.00%

Daily Std Dev

MVV:

45.25%

UMDD:

66.23%

Max Drawdown

MVV:

-85.54%

UMDD:

-86.24%

Current Drawdown

MVV:

-25.50%

UMDD:

-44.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVV achieves a -11.37% return, which is significantly higher than UMDD's -20.43% return. Over the past 10 years, MVV has outperformed UMDD with an annualized return of 8.83%, while UMDD has yielded a comparatively lower 5.09% annualized return.


MVV

YTD

-11.37%

1M

10.32%

6M

-24.11%

1Y

-2.73%

3Y*

3.75%

5Y*

16.66%

10Y*

8.83%

UMDD

YTD

-20.43%

1M

15.52%

6M

-37.40%

1Y

-12.19%

3Y*

-2.57%

5Y*

16.76%

10Y*

5.09%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ProShares Ultra Midcap 400

ProShares UltraPro MidCap400

MVV vs. UMDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MVV and UMDD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MVV vs. UMDD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MVV is 1212
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MVV is 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MVV is 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MVV is 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MVV is 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MVV is 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

UMDD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UMDD is 1010
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UMDD is 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UMDD is 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UMDD is 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UMDD is 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UMDD is 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MVV vs. UMDD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MVV Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is higher than the UMDD Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVV and UMDD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

MVV vs. UMDD - Dividend Comparison

MVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than UMDD's 1.04% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MVV
ProShares Ultra Midcap 400
0.48%0.39%0.77%0.93%0.16%0.29%0.62%0.62%0.21%0.43%0.17%0.00%
UMDD
ProShares UltraPro MidCap400
1.04%0.76%0.19%0.49%0.06%0.08%0.64%0.32%0.00%0.03%0.06%0.08%

Drawdowns

MVV vs. UMDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVV drawdown since its inception was -85.54%, roughly equal to the maximum UMDD drawdown of -86.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVV and UMDD.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

MVV vs. UMDD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) is 11.79%, while ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) has a volatility of 17.74%. This indicates that MVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UMDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...