MVV vs. AMAGX
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX).
MVV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 21, 2006. AMAGX is managed by Amana. It was launched on Feb 3, 1994.
Performance
MVV vs. AMAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MVV vs. AMAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVV ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 | 4.75% | 3.48% | 17.75% | 22.51% | -31.96% | 48.57% | 6.20% | 49.50% | -25.44% | 30.81% |
AMAGX Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund | -3.22% | 17.62% | 15.73% | 25.67% | -19.49% | 31.51% | 32.93% | 33.09% | 2.47% | 28.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MVV achieves a 4.75% return, which is significantly higher than AMAGX's -3.22% return. Over the past 10 years, MVV has underperformed AMAGX with an annualized return of 12.30%, while AMAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.74% annualized return.
MVV
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- -11.15%
- YTD
- 4.75%
- 6M
- 5.31%
- 1Y
- 24.57%
- 3Y*
- 14.18%
- 5Y*
- 3.91%
- 10Y*
- 12.30%
AMAGX
- 1D
- 3.57%
- 1M
- -6.50%
- YTD
- -3.22%
- 6M
- -1.86%
- 1Y
- 23.71%
- 3Y*
- 15.41%
- 5Y*
- 10.77%
- 10Y*
- 15.74%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MVV vs. AMAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MVV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AMAGX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MVV vs. AMAGX — Risk / Return Rank
MVV
AMAGX
MVV vs. AMAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MVV | AMAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.57 | 1.19 | -0.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.09 | 1.78 | -0.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.25 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.97 | 2.08 | -1.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.72 | 8.67 | -4.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MVV | AMAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 | 1.19 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.59 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.86 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.65 | -0.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between MVV and AMAGX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MVV vs. AMAGX - Dividend Comparison
MVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, while AMAGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVV ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 | 0.81% | 0.77% | 0.39% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.62% | 0.62% | 0.21% | 0.43% | 0.17% |
AMAGX Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.95% | 0.65% | 3.64% | 0.52% | 5.44% | 3.15% | 3.47% | 10.90% | 13.67% | 7.45% |
Drawdowns
MVV vs. AMAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MVV drawdown since its inception was -85.54%, which is greater than AMAGX's maximum drawdown of -57.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVV and AMAGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MVV | AMAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.54% | -57.64% | -27.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.85% | -11.84% | -15.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.53% | -28.09% | -17.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.19% | -28.09% | -41.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.34% | -7.87% | -3.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.70% | -10.32% | -10.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.97% | 2.84% | +4.13% |
Volatility
MVV vs. AMAGX - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) has a higher volatility of 12.99% compared to Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX) at 7.18%. This indicates that MVV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MVV | AMAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.99% | 7.18% | +5.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.02% | 12.50% | +11.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.30% | 20.42% | +22.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.66% | 18.24% | +21.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.32% | 18.31% | +24.01% |