MVV vs. QQQ
MVV (ProShares Ultra Midcap 400) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MVV is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index (200%), while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MVV returned 14.42%/yr vs 22.07%/yr for QQQ. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MVV charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
MVV vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MVV achieves a 26.73% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 16.45% return. Over the past 10 years, MVV has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 14.42%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.07% annualized return.
MVV
- 1D
- -1.88%
- 1M
- 5.08%
- YTD
- 26.73%
- 6M
- 22.00%
- 1Y
- 44.27%
- 3Y*
- 22.25%
- 5Y*
- 7.15%
- 10Y*
- 14.42%
QQQ
- 1D
- -3.29%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- YTD
- 16.45%
- 6M
- 14.99%
- 1Y
- 34.88%
- 3Y*
- 26.05%
- 5Y*
- 16.01%
- 10Y*
- 22.07%
MVV vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVV ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 | 26.73% | 3.48% | 17.75% | 22.51% | -31.96% | 48.57% | 6.20% | 49.50% | -25.44% | 30.81% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 16.45% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between MVV and QQQ is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2006 | 0.76 |
The correlation between MVV and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MVV vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MVV
QQQ
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
MVV
QQQ
Technology
MVV
QQQ
Financial Services
MVV
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
MVV
QQQ
Healthcare
MVV
QQQ
Real Estate
MVV
QQQ
Energy
MVV
QQQ
Basic Materials
MVV
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
MVV
QQQ
Utilities
MVV
QQQ
Communication Services
MVV
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MVV vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
MVV
QQQ
MVV vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MVV | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.35 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | 2.93 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.62 | 10.86 | -2.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MVV vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MVV drawdown since its inception was -85.54%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVV and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MVV | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.54% | -82.97% | -2.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.68% | -11.96% | -5.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.80% | -22.77% | -22.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.53% | -35.12% | -10.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.19% | -35.12% | -34.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.08% | -4.25% | +2.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.50% | -32.73% | +12.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.15% | 3.22% | +1.93% |
Volatility
MVV vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) have volatilities of 9.48% and 9.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MVV | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.48% | 9.17% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.52% | 14.57% | +8.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.88% | 17.96% | +13.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.67% | 22.69% | +16.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.34% | 22.42% | +19.92% |
MVV vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
MVV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
MVV vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
MVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than QQQ's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVV ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 | 0.67% | 0.77% | 0.39% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.62% | 0.62% | 0.21% | 0.43% | 0.17% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MVV and QQQ have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MVV has higher volatility (9.48%) compared to QQQ (9.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVV dropped -85.54% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 22.07% vs 14.42% for MVV. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 9.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 22.07% return vs 14.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MVV.
MVV has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.43% for QQQ.
MVV is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. MVV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (200%), while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MVV and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MVV and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer