PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MVV vs. MIDU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MVV vs. MIDU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVV achieves a 26.73% return, which is significantly lower than MIDU's 37.67% return. Over the past 10 years, MVV has outperformed MIDU with an annualized return of 14.42%, while MIDU has yielded a comparatively lower 12.98% annualized return.


MVV

1D
-1.88%
1M
5.08%
YTD
26.73%
6M
22.00%
1Y
44.27%
3Y*
22.25%
5Y*
7.15%
10Y*
14.42%

MIDU

1D
-3.21%
1M
6.62%
YTD
37.67%
6M
30.01%
1Y
63.47%
3Y*
26.25%
5Y*
3.28%
10Y*
12.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVV vs. MIDU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MVV
ProShares Ultra Midcap 400
26.73%3.48%17.75%22.51%-31.96%48.57%6.20%49.50%-25.44%30.81%
MIDU
Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares
37.67%-2.75%20.32%27.79%-49.27%72.89%-18.31%77.38%-39.21%46.86%

Correlation

The correlation between MVV and MIDU is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2009

0.99

The correlation between MVV and MIDU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

MVV vs. MIDU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MVV
MIDU

Industrials

24.8%
5.3%

Technology

17.8%
3.4%

Financial Services

13.7%
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
2.0%

Healthcare

9.1%
1.8%

Real Estate

7.3%
1.5%

Energy

4.9%
1.0%

Basic Materials

4.8%
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
0.8%

Utilities

2.9%
0.6%

Communication Services

1.0%
0.2%

Industrials

MVV
24.8%
MIDU
5.3%

Technology

MVV
17.8%
MIDU
3.4%

Financial Services

MVV
13.7%
MIDU
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

MVV
10.5%
MIDU
2.0%

Healthcare

MVV
9.1%
MIDU
1.8%

Real Estate

MVV
7.3%
MIDU
1.5%

Energy

MVV
4.9%
MIDU
1.0%

Basic Materials

MVV
4.8%
MIDU
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

MVV
3.3%
MIDU
0.8%

Utilities

MVV
2.9%
MIDU
0.6%

Communication Services

MVV
1.0%
MIDU
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MVV vs. MIDU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVV
MVV Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
MVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVV Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
MVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVV Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

MIDU
MIDU Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MIDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIDU Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
MIDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIDU Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVV vs. MIDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MVVMIDUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.23

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

2.47

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.62

8.20

+0.42

MVV vs. MIDU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVV Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the MIDU Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVV and MIDU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MVV vs. MIDU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVV drawdown since its inception was -85.54%, roughly equal to the maximum MIDU drawdown of -86.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVV and MIDU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MVVMIDUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.54%

-86.26%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.68%

-25.80%

+8.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.80%

-60.41%

+15.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.53%

-64.14%

+18.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.19%

-86.26%

+17.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.08%

-4.17%

+2.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.50%

-22.38%

+1.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.15%

7.77%

-2.62%

Volatility

MVV vs. MIDU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) is 9.48%, while Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) has a volatility of 13.97%. This indicates that MVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MIDU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MVVMIDUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.48%

13.97%

-4.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.52%

34.92%

-11.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.88%

47.39%

-15.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.67%

59.50%

-19.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.34%

63.57%

-21.23%

MVV vs. MIDU - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MIDU's 1.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

MVV vs. MIDU - Dividend Comparison

MVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than MIDU's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MIDU
Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares
0.65%1.04%1.10%1.43%0.11%0.00%0.06%0.71%0.70%2.67%1.89%0.00%
MVV
ProShares Ultra Midcap 400
0.67%0.77%0.39%0.77%0.93%0.16%0.29%0.62%0.62%0.21%0.43%0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, MVV and MIDU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MIDU has higher volatility (13.97%) compared to MVV (9.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVV dropped -85.54% vs MIDU's -86.26%.

On 10-year performance, MVV leads with 14.42% vs 12.98% for MIDU. On fees, MVV is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, MVV has been the lower-risk option at 9.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MVV has performed better with a 14.42% return vs 12.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MVV is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MIDU.

MVV has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.65% for MIDU.

MVV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (200%), while MIDU tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MVV and 1.06% for MIDU.

MVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MVV and MIDU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer