PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LRNZ vs. HACK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LRNZ vs. HACK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) and Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


LRNZ

1D
-3.48%
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HACK

1D
-1.02%
1M
14.80%
6M
37.75%
YTD
36.99%
1Y
31.36%
3Y*
29.27%
5Y*
12.92%
10Y*
16.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRNZ vs. HACK - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LRNZ and HACK is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026

0.20

LRNZ vs. HACK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LRNZ
HACK

Technology

82.1%
90.0%

Healthcare

15.0%

-

Communication Services

2.9%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.3%

Industrials

-

9.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

LRNZ
82.1%
HACK
90.0%

Healthcare

LRNZ
15.0%
HACK

-

Communication Services

LRNZ
2.9%
HACK

-

Basic Materials

LRNZ

-

HACK

-

Consumer Cyclical

LRNZ

-

HACK

-

Consumer Defensive

LRNZ

-

HACK

-

Energy

LRNZ

-

HACK

-

Financial Services

LRNZ

-

HACK
0.3%

Industrials

LRNZ

-

HACK
9.6%

Real Estate

LRNZ

-

HACK

-

Utilities

LRNZ

-

HACK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LRNZ vs. HACK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRNZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


HACK
HACK Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
HACK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HACK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
HACK Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
HACK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
HACK Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRNZ vs. HACK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) and Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LRNZHACKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.59

LRNZ vs. HACK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LRNZ vs. HACK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRNZ drawdown since its inception was -5.22%, smaller than the maximum HACK drawdown of -42.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRNZ and HACK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LRNZHACKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.22%

-42.68%

+37.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.22%

-3.67%

-1.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.24%

-11.57%

+9.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.76%

Volatility

LRNZ vs. HACK - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LRNZHACKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.71%

27.02%

+9.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.71%

24.60%

+12.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.71%

23.33%

+13.38%

LRNZ vs. HACK - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRNZ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than HACK's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

LRNZ vs. HACK - Dividend Comparison

LRNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HACK
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF
0.05%0.07%0.14%0.20%0.24%0.26%1.11%0.14%0.09%0.01%1.23%
LRNZ
TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LRNZ and HACK have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HACK is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HACK is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for LRNZ.

HACK has the higher dividend yield at 0.05%, compared with 0.00% for LRNZ.

LRNZ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while HACK is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: TrueMark Investments and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for LRNZ and 0.60% for HACK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LRNZ and HACK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer