LRNZ vs. HACK
LRNZ (TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF) and HACK (Amplify Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LRNZ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by TrueMark Investments, while HACK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq ISE Cyber Security Select Index. LRNZ is actively managed, while HACK is passively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LRNZ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for HACK.
Performance
LRNZ vs. HACK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LRNZ
- 1D
- -3.48%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HACK
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 14.80%
- 6M
- 37.75%
- YTD
- 36.99%
- 1Y
- 31.36%
- 3Y*
- 29.27%
- 5Y*
- 12.92%
- 10Y*
- 16.35%
LRNZ vs. HACK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF | -5.22% |
HACK Amplify Cybersecurity ETF | -1.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRNZ and HACK is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026 | 0.20 |
LRNZ vs. HACK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LRNZ
HACK
Technology
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
LRNZ
HACK
Healthcare
LRNZ
HACK
-
Communication Services
LRNZ
HACK
-
Basic Materials
LRNZ
-
HACK
-
Consumer Cyclical
LRNZ
-
HACK
-
Consumer Defensive
LRNZ
-
HACK
-
Energy
LRNZ
-
HACK
-
Financial Services
LRNZ
-
HACK
Industrials
LRNZ
-
HACK
Real Estate
LRNZ
-
HACK
-
Utilities
LRNZ
-
HACK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRNZ vs. HACK — Risk / Return Rank
LRNZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HACK
LRNZ vs. HACK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) and Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LRNZ | HACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.52 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.59 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LRNZ vs. HACK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRNZ drawdown since its inception was -5.22%, smaller than the maximum HACK drawdown of -42.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRNZ and HACK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRNZ | HACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.22% | -42.68% | +37.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -20.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.22% | -3.67% | -1.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.24% | -11.57% | +9.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.76% | — |
Volatility
LRNZ vs. HACK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRNZ | HACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.45% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.71% | 27.02% | +9.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.71% | 24.60% | +12.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.71% | 23.33% | +13.38% |
LRNZ vs. HACK - Expense Ratio Comparison
LRNZ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than HACK's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
LRNZ vs. HACK - Dividend Comparison
LRNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HACK Amplify Cybersecurity ETF | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.14% | 0.20% | 0.24% | 0.26% | 1.11% | 0.14% | 0.09% | 0.01% | 1.23% |
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LRNZ and HACK have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HACK is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HACK is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for LRNZ.
HACK has the higher dividend yield at 0.05%, compared with 0.00% for LRNZ.
LRNZ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while HACK is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: TrueMark Investments and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for LRNZ and 0.60% for HACK.
Find the right allocation for LRNZ and HACK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer