LRNZ vs. ARKF
LRNZ (TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF) and ARKF (ARK Fintech Innovation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LRNZ is a Artificial Intelligence fund actively managed by TrueShares, while ARKF is a Blockchain fund actively managed by ARK. Both are actively managed. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. LRNZ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARKF.
Performance
LRNZ vs. ARKF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LRNZ
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ARKF
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- -3.22%
- 6M
- -8.41%
- YTD
- -16.75%
- 1Y
- -22.13%
- 3Y*
- 18.55%
- 5Y*
- -4.77%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.71%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.49M | $5.67M | $7.32M | |
| $103.68K | $133.76K | $133.76K |
LRNZ vs. ARKF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF | -6.20% |
ARKF ARK Fintech Innovation ETF | -4.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRNZ and ARKF is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026 | 0.40 |
LRNZ vs. ARKF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LRNZ
ARKF
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
LRNZ
ARKF
Healthcare
LRNZ
ARKF
Communication Services
LRNZ
ARKF
Basic Materials
LRNZ
-
ARKF
-
Consumer Cyclical
LRNZ
-
ARKF
Consumer Defensive
LRNZ
-
ARKF
-
Energy
LRNZ
-
ARKF
-
Financial Services
LRNZ
-
ARKF
Industrials
LRNZ
-
ARKF
-
Real Estate
LRNZ
-
ARKF
-
Utilities
LRNZ
-
ARKF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRNZ vs. ARKF — Risk / Return Rank
LRNZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ARKF
LRNZ vs. ARKF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) and ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LRNZ | ARKF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.89 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.68 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.10 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LRNZ vs. ARKF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRNZ drawdown since its inception was -11.91%, smaller than the maximum ARKF drawdown of -78.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRNZ and ARKF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRNZ | ARKF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.91% | -78.63% | +66.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -38.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -38.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -75.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.20% | -37.60% | +31.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.75% | -34.98% | +29.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 23.82% | — |
Volatility
LRNZ vs. ARKF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRNZ | ARKF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.29% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 26.23% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.30% | 34.01% | +0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.30% | 42.99% | -8.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.30% | 39.63% | -5.33% |
LRNZ vs. ARKF - Expense Ratio Comparison
LRNZ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKF's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
LRNZ vs. ARKF - Dividend Comparison
LRNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARKF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKF ARK Fintech Innovation ETF | 0.11% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 1.25% |
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LRNZ and ARKF have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LRNZ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LRNZ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKF.
ARKF has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for LRNZ.
LRNZ is categorized as Artificial Intelligence, while ARKF is Blockchain. They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for LRNZ and 0.75% for ARKF.
Find the right allocation for LRNZ and ARKF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer