LRNZ vs. ARKF

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

LRNZ (TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF) and ARKF (ARK Fintech Innovation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LRNZ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by TrueMark Investments, while ARKF is a Blockchain fund actively managed by ARK. Both are actively managed. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. LRNZ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARKF.

Performance

LRNZ vs. ARKF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) and ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

LRNZ

• 1D: -2.30%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARKF

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: 6.19%
• 6M: -16.15%
• YTD: -13.25%
• 1Y: -18.91%
• 3Y*: 20.97%
• 5Y*: -4.30%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRNZ vs. ARKF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF	-3.01%
ARKF ARK Fintech Innovation ETF	-0.31%

Correlation

The correlation between LRNZ and ARKF is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026	1.00

LRNZ vs. ARKF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LRNZ	ARKF
Technology	82.1%	41.7%
Healthcare	15.0%	0.2%
Communication Services	2.9%	8.9%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	25.0%
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

LRNZ vs. ARKF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRNZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ARKF

ARKF Risk / Return Rank: 5
ARKF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
ARKF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
ARKF Omega Ratio Rank: 5
ARKF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
ARKF Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRNZ vs. ARKF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) and ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LRNZ	ARKF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.56	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-0.61	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.93	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.49	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-0.83	—

Drawdowns

LRNZ vs. ARKF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRNZ drawdown since its inception was -3.01%, smaller than the maximum ARKF drawdown of -78.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRNZ and ARKF.

Drawdown Indicators

	LRNZ	ARKF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.01%	-78.63%	+75.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-38.50%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-38.50%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-75.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.01%	-34.97%	+31.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.87%	-34.97%	+33.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	22.71%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LRNZ	ARKF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.81%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	25.64%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.72%	33.71%	-15.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.72%	42.98%	-25.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.72%	39.68%	-21.96%

LRNZ vs. ARKF - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRNZ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKF's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

LRNZ vs. ARKF - Dividend Comparison

LRNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARKF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ARKF ARK Fintech Innovation ETF	0.10%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.37%	1.25%
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LRNZ and ARKF in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, LRNZ and ARKF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, LRNZ or ARKF?

On fees, LRNZ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LRNZ or ARKF?

LRNZ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LRNZ or ARKF?

ARKF has the higher dividend yield at 0.10%, compared with 0.00% for LRNZ.

What is the main difference between LRNZ and ARKF?

LRNZ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ARKF is Blockchain. They also come from different issuers: TrueMark Investments and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for LRNZ and 0.75% for ARKF.