LRNZ vs. THNQ

In the year-to-date period, LRNZ achieves a -3.03% return, which is significantly higher than THNQ's -4.88% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Both LRNZ and THNQ have an expense ratio of 0.68%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) and ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LRNZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the THNQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRNZ and THNQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither LRNZ nor THNQ has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum LRNZ drawdown since its inception was -61.38%, which is greater than THNQ's maximum drawdown of -50.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRNZ and THNQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) has a higher volatility of 20.29% compared to ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) at 18.42%. This indicates that LRNZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.