PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
LRNZ vs. BOTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

LRNZ vs. BOTZ

Last updated Jul 14, 2026
Documentation

LRNZ (TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LRNZ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by TrueMark Investments, while BOTZ is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. LRNZ is actively managed, while BOTZ is passively managed. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.68% expense ratio.

Performance

LRNZ vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

LRNZ

1D
-2.30%
1M
—
6M
—
YTD
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

BOTZ

1D
-2.82%
1M
-3.32%
6M
-6.64%
YTD
-0.94%
1Y
11.69%
3Y*
7.16%
5Y*
1.21%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRNZ vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)
LRNZ
TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF		-3.01%
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF		-2.07%

Correlation

The correlation between LRNZ and BOTZ is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026

1.00

LRNZ vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
LRNZ
BOTZ

Technology

82.1%
31.8%

Healthcare

15.0%
8.0%

Communication Services

2.9%
4.4%

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Energy

-

0.5%

Financial Services

-

0.9%

Industrials

-

49.3%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

0.0%

Technology

LRNZ
82.1%
BOTZ
31.8%

Healthcare

LRNZ
15.0%
BOTZ
8.0%

Communication Services

LRNZ
2.9%
BOTZ
4.4%

Basic Materials

LRNZ

-

BOTZ
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

LRNZ

-

BOTZ
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

LRNZ

-

BOTZ
0.0%

Energy

LRNZ

-

BOTZ
0.5%

Financial Services

LRNZ

-

BOTZ
0.9%

Industrials

LRNZ

-

BOTZ
49.3%

Real Estate

LRNZ

-

BOTZ

-

Utilities

LRNZ

-

BOTZ
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF

Often compared with LRNZ:
LRNZ vs. THNQLRNZ vs. DATLRNZ vs. AIQLRNZ vs. ARKFLRNZ vs. ^GSPCLRNZ vs. ITOTLRNZ vs. SCHG
Often compared with BOTZ:
BOTZ vs. ROBOBOTZ vs. AIQBOTZ vs. ARKQBOTZ vs. IRBOBOTZ vs. ROBTBOTZ vs. SPYBOTZ vs. QQQ

Return for Risk

LRNZ vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
LRNZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRNZ vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

LRNZBOTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

—

0.45

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

—

0.81

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

—

1.10

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

—

0.61

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

—

1.79

—

LRNZ vs. BOTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LRNZ vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRNZ drawdown since its inception was -3.01%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRNZ and BOTZ.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

LRNZBOTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.01%

-55.54%

+52.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-19.34%

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-29.02%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-55.54%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.01%

-13.79%

+10.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.87%

-18.23%

+16.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

6.54%

—

Volatility

LRNZ vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

LRNZBOTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

10.37%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

21.17%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.72%

26.29%

-8.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.72%

27.21%

-9.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.72%

25.88%

-8.16%

LRNZ vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LRNZ and BOTZ have an expense ratio of 0.68%.

Dividends

LRNZ vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

LRNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF		0.49%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%
LRNZ
TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 1.00, LRNZ and BOTZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.68% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LRNZ and BOTZ have the same expense ratio: 0.68% per year.

BOTZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.00% for LRNZ.

LRNZ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BOTZ is Robotics. They also come from different issuers: TrueMark Investments and Global X.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LRNZ and BOTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer