PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HACK vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

HACK vs. QQQ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HACK (Amplify Cybersecurity ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HACK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq ISE Cyber Security Select Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HACK returned 15.64%/yr vs 22.07%/yr for QQQ. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HACK charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.

Performance

HACK vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HACK achieves a 19.40% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 16.45% return. Over the past 10 years, HACK has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 15.64%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.07% annualized return.

HACK

1D
1.24%
1M
1.17%
YTD
19.40%
6M
17.34%
1Y
14.12%
3Y*
25.16%
5Y*
9.42%
10Y*
15.64%

QQQ

1D
-3.29%
1M
-0.43%
YTD
16.45%
6M
14.99%
1Y
34.88%
3Y*
26.05%
5Y*
16.01%
10Y*
22.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HACK vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HACK
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF		19.40%7.97%23.49%37.44%-28.16%7.03%41.51%23.39%6.61%19.68%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF		16.45%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between HACK and QQQ is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2014

0.75

The correlation between HACK and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HACK vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
HACK
QQQ

Technology

92.7%
58.7%

Industrials

7.2%
2.6%

Financial Services

0.1%
0.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.0%

Communication Services

-

14.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

11.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.4%

Energy

-

0.5%

Healthcare

-

3.7%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.2%

Technology

HACK
92.7%
QQQ
58.7%

Industrials

HACK
7.2%
QQQ
2.6%

Financial Services

HACK
0.1%
QQQ
0.2%

Basic Materials

HACK

-

QQQ
1.0%

Communication Services

HACK

-

QQQ
14.3%

Consumer Cyclical

HACK

-

QQQ
11.4%

Consumer Defensive

HACK

-

QQQ
6.4%

Energy

HACK

-

QQQ
0.5%

Healthcare

HACK

-

QQQ
3.7%

Real Estate

HACK

-

QQQ
0.1%

Utilities

HACK

-

QQQ
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Amplify Cybersecurity ETF

Invesco QQQ ETF

Often compared with HACK:
HACK vs. CIBRHACK vs. BUGHACK vs. WCBRHACK vs. VOOHACK vs. FEATXHACK vs. SPAMHACK vs. AWAY
Often compared with QQQ:
QQQ vs. SPYQQQ vs. VOOQQQ vs. VGTQQQ vs. TQQQQQQ vs. SMHQQQ vs. QQQMQQQ vs. SPMO

Return for Risk

HACK vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HACK
HACK Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
HACK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HACK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
HACK Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
HACK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
HACK Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HACK vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

HACKQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.55
1.95

-1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.90
2.57

-1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.35

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.69

2.93

-2.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.61

10.86

-9.26

HACK vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HACK Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HACK and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HACK vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HACK drawdown since its inception was -42.68%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HACK and QQQ.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

HACKQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.68%

-82.97%

+40.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.67%

-11.96%

-8.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.90%

-22.77%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.68%

-35.12%

-3.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.68%

-35.12%

-3.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.93%

-4.25%

-4.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.62%

-32.73%

+21.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.80%

3.22%

+5.58%

Volatility

HACK vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) has a higher volatility of 11.83% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 9.17%. This indicates that HACK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

HACKQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.83%

9.17%

+2.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.94%

14.57%

+7.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.06%

17.96%

+8.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.30%

22.69%

+1.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.25%

22.42%

+0.83%

HACK vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HACK has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

HACK vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

HACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than QQQ's 0.43% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HACK
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF		0.06%0.07%0.14%0.20%0.24%0.26%1.11%0.14%0.09%0.01%1.23%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF		0.43%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

HACK and QQQ have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HACK has higher volatility (11.83%) compared to QQQ (9.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HACK dropped -42.68% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 22.07% vs 15.64% for HACK. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 9.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 22.07% return vs 15.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HACK.

QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.06% for HACK.

HACK is categorized as Technology Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. HACK tracks Nasdaq ISE Cyber Security Select Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for HACK and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HACK and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer