HACK vs. FEATX

In the year-to-date period, HACK achieves a 7.40% return, which is significantly lower than FEATX's 9.05% return. Over the past 10 years, HACK has outperformed FEATX with an annualized return of 10.83%, while FEATX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.27% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

HACK has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FEATX's 1.45% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current HACK Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is comparable to the FEATX Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HACK and FEATX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

HACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, while FEATX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum HACK drawdown since its inception was -42.68%, smaller than the maximum FEATX drawdown of -64.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HACK and FEATX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) has a higher volatility of 6.84% compared to Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX) at 5.36%. This indicates that HACK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEATX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.