HACK vs. FEATX
Compare and contrast key facts about ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX).
HACK is a passively managed fund by ETFMG that tracks the performance of the Prime Cyber Defense Index. It was launched on Nov 11, 2014. FEATX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 15, 1999.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HACK or FEATX.
Correlation
The correlation between HACK and FEATX is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
HACK vs. FEATX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
HACK:
1.30
FEATX:
1.52
HACK:
1.76
FEATX:
2.22
HACK:
1.24
FEATX:
1.26
HACK:
1.92
FEATX:
0.51
HACK:
5.22
FEATX:
7.23
HACK:
4.91%
FEATX:
3.70%
HACK:
19.70%
FEATX:
17.60%
HACK:
-42.68%
FEATX:
-64.55%
HACK:
-5.04%
FEATX:
-38.88%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HACK achieves a 24.18% return, which is significantly higher than FEATX's 22.29% return. Over the past 10 years, HACK has outperformed FEATX with an annualized return of 11.24%, while FEATX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.88% annualized return.
HACK
24.18%
4.91%
19.38%
24.45%
13.14%
11.24%
FEATX
22.29%
-1.42%
9.22%
24.68%
3.02%
4.88%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HACK vs. FEATX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HACK has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FEATX's 1.45% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HACK vs. FEATX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HACK vs. FEATX - Dividend Comparison
HACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, while FEATX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF | 0.18% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.26% | 1.11% | 0.14% | 0.09% | 0.01% | 1.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.09% | 0.17% | 0.32% | 0.65% | 1.84% | 6.24% | 5.70% |
Drawdowns
HACK vs. FEATX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HACK drawdown since its inception was -42.68%, smaller than the maximum FEATX drawdown of -64.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HACK and FEATX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HACK vs. FEATX - Volatility Comparison
ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) has a higher volatility of 7.74% compared to Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX) at 3.88%. This indicates that HACK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEATX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.