HACK vs. FEATX

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

HACK (Amplify Cybersecurity ETF) and FEATX (Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M) are both funds - HACK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq ISE Cyber Security Select Index, while FEATX is a Asia Pacific Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, HACK returned 15.86%/yr vs 13.45%/yr for FEATX. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HACK charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.45%/yr for FEATX.

Performance

HACK vs. FEATX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HACK achieves a 32.87% return, which is significantly higher than FEATX's 23.29% return. Over the past 10 years, HACK has outperformed FEATX with an annualized return of 15.86%, while FEATX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.45% annualized return.

HACK

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: -0.17%
• 6M: 38.24%
• YTD: 32.87%
• 1Y: 28.11%
• 3Y*: 26.69%
• 5Y*: 11.45%
• 10Y*: 15.86%
• ALL TIME*: 13.64%

FEATX

• 1D: 3.44%
• 1M: -6.71%
• 6M: 13.07%
• YTD: 23.29%
• 1Y: 41.98%
• 3Y*: 26.66%
• 5Y*: 7.28%
• 10Y*: 13.45%
• ALL TIME*: 9.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FEATX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
HACK Amplify Cybersecurity ETF	$20.39M	$24.21M	$17.68M

HACK vs. FEATX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HACK Amplify Cybersecurity ETF	32.87%	7.97%	23.49%	37.44%	-28.16%	7.03%	41.51%	23.39%	6.61%	19.68%
FEATX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M	23.29%	36.34%	20.32%	13.22%	-30.99%	-15.29%	72.05%	30.26%	-15.36%	45.82%

Correlation

The correlation between HACK and FEATX is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.50
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2014	0.52

The correlation between HACK and FEATX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HACK vs. FEATX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HACK	FEATX
Technology	89.7%	56.1%
Industrials	9.9%	9.5%
Financial Services	0.3%	13.7%
Basic Materials	-	5.5%
Communication Services	-	3.6%
Consumer Cyclical	-	6.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.6%
Energy	-	1.5%
Healthcare	-	2.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

HACK vs. FEATX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HACK

HACK Risk / Return Rank: 37
HACK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
HACK Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
HACK Omega Ratio Rank: 37
HACK Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
HACK Martin Ratio Rank: 32

FEATX

FEATX Risk / Return Rank: 64
FEATX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
FEATX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
FEATX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FEATX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
FEATX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HACK vs. FEATX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HACK	FEATX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.95	1.54	-0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.43	2.01	-0.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.29	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.26	2.50	-1.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.95	8.12	-5.18

HACK vs. FEATX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HACK Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the FEATX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HACK and FEATX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HACK vs. FEATX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HACK drawdown since its inception was -42.68%, smaller than the maximum FEATX drawdown of -60.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HACK and FEATX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HACK	FEATX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.68%	-60.97%	+18.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.67%	-15.62%	-5.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.90%	-17.43%	-4.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.68%	-50.88%	+12.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.68%	-58.09%	+19.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.56%	-12.71%	+6.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.55%	-20.60%	+9.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.81%	4.80%	+4.01%

Volatility

HACK vs. FEATX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) is 8.88%, while Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX) has a volatility of 9.96%. This indicates that HACK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEATX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HACK	FEATX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.88%	9.96%	-1.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.39%	23.06%	+0.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.37%	25.40%	+1.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.64%	23.76%	+0.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.36%	21.51%	+1.85%

HACK vs. FEATX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HACK has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FEATX's 1.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

HACK vs. FEATX - Dividend Comparison

HACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, while FEATX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FEATX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	13.43%	6.70%	5.07%	6.24%	0.03%	0.89%	0.87%
HACK Amplify Cybersecurity ETF	0.06%	0.07%	0.14%	0.20%	0.24%	0.26%	1.11%	0.14%	0.09%	0.01%	1.23%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HACK and FEATX in my portfolio?

HACK and FEATX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HACK or FEATX?

FEATX has higher volatility (9.96%) compared to HACK (8.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HACK dropped -42.68% vs FEATX's -60.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FEATX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.