PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
HACK vs. FEATX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HACK vs. FEATX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
195.10%
58.94%
HACK
FEATX

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HACK achieves a 17.54% return, which is significantly lower than FEATX's 21.13% return. Over the past 10 years, HACK has outperformed FEATX with an annualized return of 11.47%, while FEATX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.92% annualized return.


HACK

YTD

17.54%

1M

-0.46%

6M

12.76%

1Y

31.35%

5Y (annualized)

12.15%

10Y (annualized)

11.47%

FEATX

YTD

21.13%

1M

-4.17%

6M

7.66%

1Y

25.29%

5Y (annualized)

2.63%

10Y (annualized)

4.92%

Key characteristics


HACKFEATX
Sharpe Ratio1.631.40
Sortino Ratio2.152.09
Omega Ratio1.291.24
Calmar Ratio1.520.47
Martin Ratio6.257.72
Ulcer Index4.83%3.19%
Daily Std Dev18.54%17.53%
Max Drawdown-42.68%-64.55%
Current Drawdown-5.20%-39.46%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HACK vs. FEATX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HACK has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FEATX's 1.45% expense ratio.


FEATX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M
Expense ratio chart for FEATX: current value at 1.45% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.45%
Expense ratio chart for HACK: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between HACK and FEATX is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

HACK vs. FEATX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HACK, currently valued at 1.63, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.631.40
The chart of Sortino ratio for HACK, currently valued at 2.15, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.152.09
The chart of Omega ratio for HACK, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.291.24
The chart of Calmar ratio for HACK, currently valued at 1.52, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.520.47
The chart of Martin ratio for HACK, currently valued at 6.25, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.006.257.72
HACK
FEATX

The current HACK Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the FEATX Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HACK and FEATX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.63
1.40
HACK
FEATX

Dividends

HACK vs. FEATX - Dividend Comparison

HACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, while FEATX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
HACK
ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF
0.19%0.21%0.24%0.26%1.11%0.14%0.09%0.01%1.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FEATX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.09%0.17%0.32%0.65%1.84%6.24%5.70%

Drawdowns

HACK vs. FEATX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HACK drawdown since its inception was -42.68%, smaller than the maximum FEATX drawdown of -64.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HACK and FEATX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-5.20%
-39.46%
HACK
FEATX

Volatility

HACK vs. FEATX - Volatility Comparison

ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) has a higher volatility of 6.74% compared to Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX) at 5.10%. This indicates that HACK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEATX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.74%
5.10%
HACK
FEATX