HACK vs. FEATX
Compare and contrast key facts about ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX).
HACK is a passively managed fund by ETFMG that tracks the performance of the Prime Cyber Defense Index. It was launched on Nov 11, 2014. FEATX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 15, 1999.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HACK or FEATX.
Key characteristics
HACK | FEATX | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 1.34% | 8.05% |
1Y Return | 40.69% | 20.20% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 2.69% | -11.17% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 8.63% | 5.87% |
Sharpe Ratio | 2.30 | 1.26 |
Daily Std Dev | 17.80% | 16.06% |
Max Drawdown | -42.68% | -60.97% |
Current Drawdown | -9.23% | -39.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between HACK and FEATX is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
HACK vs. FEATX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, HACK achieves a 1.34% return, which is significantly lower than FEATX's 8.05% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HACK vs. FEATX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HACK has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FEATX's 1.45% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HACK vs. FEATX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HACK vs. FEATX - Dividend Comparison
HACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, while FEATX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF | 0.20% | 0.20% | 0.24% | 0.26% | 1.11% | 0.14% | 0.09% | 0.01% | 1.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 13.43% | 6.70% | 5.07% | 6.24% | 0.36% | 0.89% | 1.84% | 6.24% | 5.70% |
Drawdowns
HACK vs. FEATX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HACK drawdown since its inception was -42.68%, smaller than the maximum FEATX drawdown of -60.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HACK and FEATX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HACK vs. FEATX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) is 5.27%, while Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX) has a volatility of 6.34%. This indicates that HACK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEATX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.