LRNZ vs. ITOT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

LRNZ (TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF) and ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LRNZ is a Artificial Intelligence fund actively managed by TrueShares, while ITOT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Total Market Index. LRNZ is actively managed, while ITOT is passively managed. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LRNZ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ITOT.

Performance

LRNZ vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

LRNZ

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

ITOT

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -0.09%
• 6M: 8.89%
• YTD: 10.57%
• 1Y: 21.81%
• 3Y*: 18.94%
• 5Y*: 11.75%
• 10Y*: 14.60%
• ALL TIME*: 10.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF	$209.16M	$238.83M	$306.83M
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF	$103.68K	$133.76K	$133.76K

LRNZ vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF	-6.20%
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF	-0.84%

Correlation

The correlation between LRNZ and ITOT is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026	0.51

LRNZ vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LRNZ	ITOT
Technology	76.5%	36.4%
Healthcare	19.5%	9.5%
Communication Services	4.0%	9.1%
Basic Materials	-	1.9%
Consumer Cyclical	-	9.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.3%
Energy	-	3.1%
Financial Services	-	11.9%
Industrials	-	9.9%
Real Estate	-	2.3%
Utilities	-	2.2%

Return for Risk

LRNZ vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LRNZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ITOT

ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 67
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 64
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LRNZ vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LRNZ	ITOT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.51	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.10	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.27	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.23	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.56	—

Drawdowns

LRNZ vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRNZ drawdown since its inception was -11.91%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRNZ and ITOT.

Drawdown Indicators

	LRNZ	ITOT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.91%	-55.20%	+43.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.90%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.44%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.36%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.20%	-1.34%	-4.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.75%	-6.93%	+1.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.07%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LRNZ	ITOT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.52%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.27%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.30%	13.14%	+21.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.30%	17.47%	+16.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.30%	18.27%	+16.03%

LRNZ vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRNZ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

LRNZ vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

LRNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ITOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF	1.01%	1.11%	1.23%	1.47%	1.66%	1.18%	1.41%	1.88%	2.14%	1.69%	1.83%	2.01%
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LRNZ and ITOT in my portfolio?

LRNZ and ITOT have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LRNZ or ITOT?

On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LRNZ or ITOT?

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for LRNZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LRNZ or ITOT?

ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for LRNZ.

What is the main difference between LRNZ and ITOT?

LRNZ is categorized as Artificial Intelligence, while ITOT is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for LRNZ and 0.03% for ITOT.