PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
LRNZ vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

LRNZ vs. ITOT

Last updated Jul 14, 2026
Documentation

LRNZ (TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF) and ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LRNZ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by TrueMark Investments, while ITOT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Total Market Index. LRNZ is actively managed, while ITOT is passively managed. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. LRNZ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ITOT.

Performance

LRNZ vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

LRNZ

1D
-2.30%
1M
—
6M
—
YTD
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

ITOT

1D
-0.82%
1M
1.16%
6M
8.51%
YTD
10.96%
1Y
21.72%
3Y*
19.76%
5Y*
12.00%
10Y*
14.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRNZ vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)
LRNZ
TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF		-3.01%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF		-0.48%

Correlation

The correlation between LRNZ and ITOT is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026

1.00

LRNZ vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
LRNZ
ITOT

Technology

82.1%
37.2%

Healthcare

15.0%
8.8%

Communication Services

2.9%
9.8%

Basic Materials

-

2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.3%

Energy

-

3.3%

Financial Services

-

11.4%

Industrials

-

9.1%

Real Estate

-

2.3%

Utilities

-

2.1%

Technology

LRNZ
82.1%
ITOT
37.2%

Healthcare

LRNZ
15.0%
ITOT
8.8%

Communication Services

LRNZ
2.9%
ITOT
9.8%

Basic Materials

LRNZ

-

ITOT
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

LRNZ

-

ITOT
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

LRNZ

-

ITOT
4.3%

Energy

LRNZ

-

ITOT
3.3%

Financial Services

LRNZ

-

ITOT
11.4%

Industrials

LRNZ

-

ITOT
9.1%

Real Estate

LRNZ

-

ITOT
2.3%

Utilities

LRNZ

-

ITOT
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF

iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF

Often compared with LRNZ:
LRNZ vs. THNQLRNZ vs. BOTZLRNZ vs. DATLRNZ vs. AIQLRNZ vs. ARKFLRNZ vs. ^GSPCLRNZ vs. SCHG
Often compared with ITOT:
ITOT vs. VTIITOT vs. VOOITOT vs. SCHBITOT vs. SPYITOT vs. FSKAXITOT vs. IVVITOT vs. IXUS

Return for Risk

LRNZ vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
LRNZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRNZ vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

LRNZITOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

—

1.70

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

—

2.35

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

—

1.31

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

—

2.45

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

—

10.69

—

LRNZ vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LRNZ vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRNZ drawdown since its inception was -3.01%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRNZ and ITOT.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

LRNZITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.01%

-55.20%

+52.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-8.90%

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-19.44%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-25.36%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-35.00%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.01%

-0.98%

-2.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.87%

-6.95%

+5.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

2.04%

—

Volatility

LRNZ vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

LRNZITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

4.05%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

10.15%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.72%

12.87%

+4.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.72%

17.47%

+0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.72%

18.25%

-0.53%

LRNZ vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRNZ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

LRNZ vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

LRNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ITOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF		1.00%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%
LRNZ
TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 1.00, LRNZ and ITOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for LRNZ.

ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.00% for LRNZ.

LRNZ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ITOT is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: TrueMark Investments and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for LRNZ and 0.03% for ITOT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LRNZ and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer