HACK vs. SPAM
Compare and contrast key facts about ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) and Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM).
HACK and SPAM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HACK is a passively managed fund by ETFMG that tracks the performance of the Prime Cyber Defense Index. It was launched on Nov 11, 2014. SPAM is a passively managed fund by Themes that tracks the performance of the Solactive Cyber Security Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Dec 7, 2023. Both HACK and SPAM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
HACK vs. SPAM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HACK vs. SPAM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HACK ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF | -6.57% | 7.97% | 23.49% | 4.97% |
SPAM Themes Cybersecurity ETF | -5.88% | 4.86% | 10.58% | 5.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HACK achieves a -6.57% return, which is significantly lower than SPAM's -5.88% return.
HACK
- 1D
- 3.66%
- 1M
- 2.64%
- YTD
- -6.57%
- 6M
- -13.43%
- 1Y
- 4.66%
- 3Y*
- 16.40%
- 5Y*
- 6.37%
- 10Y*
- 12.57%
SPAM
- 1D
- 3.78%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- -5.88%
- 6M
- -17.32%
- 1Y
- 1.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HACK vs. SPAM - Expense Ratio Comparison
HACK has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPAM's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HACK vs. SPAM — Risk / Return Rank
HACK
SPAM
HACK vs. SPAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) and Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HACK | SPAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.18 | 0.07 | +0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.44 | 0.29 | +0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.04 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | 0.01 | +0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.49 | 0.02 | +0.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HACK | SPAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 | 0.07 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.27 | +0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between HACK and SPAM is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HACK vs. SPAM - Dividend Comparison
HACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than SPAM's 0.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HACK ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.14% | 0.20% | 0.24% | 0.26% | 1.11% | 0.14% | 0.09% | 0.01% | 1.23% |
SPAM Themes Cybersecurity ETF | 0.52% | 0.49% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HACK vs. SPAM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HACK drawdown since its inception was -42.68%, which is greater than SPAM's maximum drawdown of -24.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HACK and SPAM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HACK | SPAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.68% | -24.02% | -18.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.67% | -24.02% | +3.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.73% | -20.11% | +4.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.70% | -6.37% | -5.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.75% | 9.78% | -2.03% |
Volatility
HACK vs. SPAM - Volatility Comparison
ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) and Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM) have volatilities of 8.05% and 8.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HACK | SPAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.05% | 8.04% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.03% | 19.15% | -2.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.02% | 26.80% | -0.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.31% | 23.51% | -0.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.85% | 23.51% | -0.66% |