LRNZ vs. ^GSPC
LRNZ (TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by TrueMark Investments, while ^GSPC (S&P 500 Index) is an index. Over the past 5 years, LRNZ returned 5.90%/yr vs 11.99%/yr for ^GSPC. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
LRNZ vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRNZ achieves a 27.27% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 9.16% return.
LRNZ
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 11.82%
- YTD
- 27.27%
- 6M
- 25.14%
- 1Y
- 42.76%
- 3Y*
- 25.07%
- 5Y*
- 5.90%
- 10Y*
- —
^GSPC
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- 9.16%
- 6M
- 8.64%
- 1Y
- 25.22%
- 3Y*
- 19.78%
- 5Y*
- 11.99%
- 10Y*
- 13.88%
LRNZ vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF | 27.27% | 22.27% | 2.01% | 67.11% | -51.46% | -0.96% | 90.52% |
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | 9.16% | 16.39% | 23.31% | 24.23% | -19.44% | 26.89% | 27.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRNZ and ^GSPC is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2020 | 0.67 |
The correlation between LRNZ and ^GSPC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRNZ vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank
LRNZ
^GSPC
LRNZ vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LRNZ | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.37 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 2.78 | -1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.87 | 12.44 | -8.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LRNZ vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRNZ drawdown since its inception was -61.33%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRNZ and ^GSPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRNZ | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.33% | -56.78% | -4.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.89% | -9.10% | -17.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.10% | -18.90% | -14.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.33% | -25.43% | -35.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.28% | -1.80% | -3.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.51% | -10.71% | -15.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.07% | 2.03% | +9.04% |
Volatility
LRNZ vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison
TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) has a higher volatility of 13.78% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 4.67%. This indicates that LRNZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRNZ | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.78% | 4.67% | +9.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.46% | 9.84% | +14.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.37% | 12.50% | +17.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.43% | 16.99% | +20.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.68% | 18.11% | +19.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LRNZ and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LRNZ has higher volatility (13.78%) compared to ^GSPC (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRNZ dropped -61.33% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.
^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LRNZ and ^GSPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer