HACK vs. CIBR
Compare and contrast key facts about ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR).
HACK and CIBR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HACK is a passively managed fund by ETFMG that tracks the performance of the Prime Cyber Defense Index. It was launched on Nov 11, 2014. CIBR is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. It was launched on Jul 7, 2015. Both HACK and CIBR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HACK or CIBR.
Performance
HACK vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HACK achieves a 17.54% return, which is significantly higher than CIBR's 14.30% return.
HACK
17.54%
-0.46%
12.76%
31.35%
12.15%
11.47%
CIBR
14.30%
-1.43%
10.01%
28.77%
15.85%
N/A
Key characteristics
| HACK | CIBR | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.63 | 1.52 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.15 | 2.03 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.29 | 1.27 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.52 | 1.93 |
| Martin Ratio | 6.25 | 5.90 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.83% | 4.81% |
| Daily Std Dev | 18.54% | 18.65% |
| Max Drawdown | -42.68% | -33.89% |
| Current Drawdown | -5.20% | -4.92% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HACK vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both HACK and CIBR have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Correlation
The correlation between HACK and CIBR is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HACK vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HACK vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison
HACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than CIBR's 0.43% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HACK ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.26% | 1.11% | 0.14% | 0.09% | 0.01% | 1.23% | 0.00% |
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.43% | 0.42% | 0.30% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.22% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
Drawdowns
HACK vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HACK drawdown since its inception was -42.68%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HACK and CIBR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HACK vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison
ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) has a higher volatility of 6.74% compared to First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) at 6.31%. This indicates that HACK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.