HACK vs. BUG
HACK (ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF) and BUG (Global X Cybersecurity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - HACK tracks the Prime Cyber Defense Index while BUG tracks the Indxx Cybersecurity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HACK returned 10.72%/yr vs 5.94%/yr for BUG. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HACK charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for BUG.
Performance
HACK vs. BUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HACK achieves a 21.07% return, which is significantly higher than BUG's 15.63% return.
HACK
- 1D
- -3.80%
- 1M
- 17.06%
- YTD
- 21.07%
- 6M
- 15.53%
- 1Y
- 15.75%
- 3Y*
- 25.54%
- 5Y*
- 10.72%
- 10Y*
- 15.22%
BUG
- 1D
- -3.43%
- 1M
- 25.92%
- YTD
- 15.63%
- 6M
- 9.83%
- 1Y
- -1.53%
- 3Y*
- 13.60%
- 5Y*
- 5.94%
- 10Y*
- —
HACK vs. BUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HACK ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF | 21.07% | 7.97% | 23.49% | 37.44% | -28.16% | 7.03% | 41.51% | 6.35% |
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | 15.63% | -5.04% | 9.59% | 41.40% | -33.63% | 13.24% | 70.83% | 6.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between HACK and BUG is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2019 | 0.92 |
The correlation between HACK and BUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
HACK vs. BUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HACK
BUG
Technology
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
HACK
BUG
Industrials
HACK
BUG
-
Financial Services
HACK
BUG
-
Basic Materials
HACK
-
BUG
-
Communication Services
HACK
-
BUG
Consumer Cyclical
HACK
-
BUG
Consumer Defensive
HACK
-
BUG
Energy
HACK
-
BUG
-
Healthcare
HACK
-
BUG
Real Estate
HACK
-
BUG
-
Utilities
HACK
-
BUG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HACK vs. BUG — Risk / Return Rank
HACK
BUG
HACK vs. BUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) and Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HACK | BUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.02 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | -0.04 | +0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.84 | -0.08 | +1.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HACK | BUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | -0.05 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.21 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.47 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
HACK vs. BUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HACK drawdown since its inception was -42.68%, roughly equal to the maximum BUG drawdown of -41.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HACK and BUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HACK | BUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.68% | -41.66% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.67% | -37.69% | +17.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.90% | -37.69% | +15.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.68% | -41.66% | +2.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.66% | -8.64% | +0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.63% | -14.41% | +2.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.60% | 18.37% | -9.77% |
Volatility
HACK vs. BUG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) is 11.73%, while Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) has a volatility of 14.97%. This indicates that HACK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HACK | BUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.73% | 14.97% | -3.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.88% | 26.02% | -4.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.76% | 30.97% | -5.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.23% | 28.50% | -4.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.30% | 29.35% | -6.05% |
HACK vs. BUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
HACK has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BUG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
HACK vs. BUG - Dividend Comparison
HACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, more than BUG's 0.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.09% | 0.10% | 1.56% | 0.66% | 0.46% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HACK ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF | 0.06% | 0.07% | 0.14% | 0.20% | 0.24% | 0.26% | 1.11% | 0.14% | 0.09% | 0.01% | 1.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, HACK and BUG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BUG has higher volatility (14.97%) compared to HACK (11.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HACK dropped -42.68% vs BUG's -41.66%.
On 5-year performance, HACK leads with 10.72% vs 5.94% for BUG. On fees, BUG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, HACK has been the lower-risk option at 11.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HACK has performed better with a 10.72% return vs 5.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BUG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HACK.
HACK has the higher dividend yield at 0.06%, compared with 0.03% for BUG.
HACK tracks Prime Cyber Defense Index, while BUG tracks Indxx Cybersecurity Index. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for HACK and 0.50% for BUG.
HACK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HACK and BUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer