PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSIE vs. GSEW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSIE vs. GSEW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) and Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSIE achieves a 11.28% return, which is significantly lower than GSEW's 12.06% return.


GSIE

1D
-0.64%
1M
2.31%
6M
7.16%
YTD
11.28%
1Y
24.11%
3Y*
17.11%
5Y*
9.07%
10Y*
9.54%
ALL TIME*
9.02%

GSEW

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.50%
6M
9.23%
YTD
12.06%
1Y
17.95%
3Y*
15.44%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.73M$7.29M$6.34M
$17.78M$19.71M$20.28M

GSIE vs. GSEW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSIE
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
11.28%32.53%5.23%16.99%-15.86%13.27%7.45%22.83%-13.40%4.81%
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
12.06%11.97%16.89%17.80%-17.54%25.43%16.28%31.04%-8.11%7.72%

Correlation

The correlation between GSIE and GSEW is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2017

0.79

The correlation between GSIE and GSEW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSIE vs. GSEW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSIE
GSEW

Financial Services

27.3%
15.1%

Industrials

18.6%
16.4%

Technology

10.6%
18.3%

Healthcare

9.6%
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.5%
5.7%

Basic Materials

5.4%
4.3%

Energy

4.2%
4.2%

Communication Services

3.8%
3.9%

Utilities

3.3%
5.9%

Real Estate

1.2%
4.3%

Financial Services

GSIE
27.3%
GSEW
15.1%

Industrials

GSIE
18.6%
GSEW
16.4%

Technology

GSIE
10.6%
GSEW
18.3%

Healthcare

GSIE
9.6%
GSEW
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

GSIE
8.6%
GSEW
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

GSIE
7.5%
GSEW
5.7%

Basic Materials

GSIE
5.4%
GSEW
4.3%

Energy

GSIE
4.2%
GSEW
4.2%

Communication Services

GSIE
3.8%
GSEW
3.9%

Utilities

GSIE
3.3%
GSEW
5.9%

Real Estate

GSIE
1.2%
GSEW
4.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSIE vs. GSEW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GSIE
GSIE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
GSIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

GSEW
GSEW Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
GSEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSEW Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
GSEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSEW Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GSIE vs. GSEW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) and Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSIEGSEWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.24

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

2.16

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.50

8.34

+0.16

GSIE vs. GSEW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSIE Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the GSEW Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSIE and GSEW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSIE vs. GSEW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSIE drawdown since its inception was -34.63%, smaller than the maximum GSEW drawdown of -38.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIE and GSEW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSIEGSEWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.63%

-38.65%

+4.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.76%

-7.72%

-3.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.07%

-18.18%

+5.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.97%

-25.74%

-4.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-1.09%

+0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.98%

-5.80%

-0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

2.00%

+0.80%

Volatility

GSIE vs. GSEW - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) has a higher volatility of 4.12% compared to Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) at 2.52%. This indicates that GSIE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSEW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSIEGSEWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

2.52%

+1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.49%

9.17%

+3.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.58%

12.30%

+2.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.12%

16.92%

-0.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.51%

19.08%

-2.57%

GSIE vs. GSEW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSIE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than GSEW's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GSIE vs. GSEW - Dividend Comparison

GSIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, more than GSEW's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
1.38%1.52%1.46%1.64%1.74%1.34%1.53%1.66%1.56%0.54%0.00%0.00%
GSIE
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
2.50%2.65%3.11%2.87%3.01%2.40%1.60%2.80%2.68%2.31%2.15%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSIE and GSEW have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSIE has higher volatility (4.12%) compared to GSEW (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSIE dropped -34.63% vs GSEW's -38.65%.

On 5-year performance, GSIE leads with 9.07% vs 8.49% for GSEW. On fees, GSEW is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GSEW has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GSIE has performed better with a 9.07% return vs 8.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSEW is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GSIE.

GSIE has the higher dividend yield at 2.50%, compared with 1.38% for GSEW.

GSIE is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while GSEW is Large Cap Blend Equities. GSIE tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index, while GSEW tracks Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GSIE and 0.09% for GSEW.

GSIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSIE and GSEW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer