GSEW vs. QQQE
GSEW (Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF) and QQQE (Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - GSEW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index, while QQQE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSEW returned 8.84%/yr vs 10.25%/yr for QQQE. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSEW charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for QQQE.
Performance
GSEW vs. QQQE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSEW achieves a 10.61% return, which is significantly lower than QQQE's 18.85% return.
GSEW
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 3.38%
- YTD
- 10.61%
- 6M
- 10.52%
- 1Y
- 19.76%
- 3Y*
- 17.95%
- 5Y*
- 8.84%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQE
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 9.15%
- YTD
- 18.85%
- 6M
- 17.59%
- 1Y
- 28.07%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 10.25%
- 10Y*
- 15.43%
GSEW vs. QQQE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSEW Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 10.61% | 11.97% | 16.89% | 17.80% | -17.54% | 25.43% | 16.28% | 31.04% | -8.11% | 7.67% |
QQQE Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares | 18.85% | 14.58% | 6.98% | 33.76% | -24.47% | 17.93% | 37.85% | 36.43% | -5.40% | 5.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSEW and QQQE is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2017 | 0.88 |
The correlation between GSEW and QQQE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSEW vs. QQQE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSEW
QQQE
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
Technology
GSEW
QQQE
Industrials
GSEW
QQQE
Financial Services
GSEW
QQQE
Healthcare
GSEW
QQQE
Consumer Cyclical
GSEW
QQQE
Utilities
GSEW
QQQE
Consumer Defensive
GSEW
QQQE
Energy
GSEW
QQQE
Basic Materials
GSEW
QQQE
Real Estate
GSEW
QQQE
Communication Services
GSEW
QQQE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSEW vs. QQQE — Risk / Return Rank
GSEW
QQQE
GSEW vs. QQQE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSEW | QQQE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.34 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | 3.00 | -0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.83 | 10.34 | -0.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSEW | QQQE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64 | 2.00 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.51 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.76 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
GSEW vs. QQQE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSEW drawdown since its inception was -38.65%, which is greater than QQQE's maximum drawdown of -32.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEW and QQQE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSEW | QQQE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.65% | -32.14% | -6.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.72% | -9.41% | +1.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.18% | -21.38% | +3.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.74% | -32.14% | +6.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.32% | +0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.89% | -5.17% | -0.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | 2.72% | -0.70% |
Volatility
GSEW vs. QQQE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) is 2.82%, while Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE) has a volatility of 3.82%. This indicates that GSEW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSEW | QQQE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.82% | 3.82% | -1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.09% | 10.61% | -1.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.13% | 14.13% | -2.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.92% | 20.29% | -3.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.19% | 20.72% | -1.53% |
GSEW vs. QQQE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSEW has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSEW vs. QQQE - Dividend Comparison
GSEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, more than QQQE's 0.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSEW Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 1.41% | 1.52% | 1.46% | 1.64% | 1.74% | 1.34% | 1.53% | 1.66% | 1.56% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQE Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares | 0.52% | 0.52% | 0.86% | 0.79% | 0.98% | 3.83% | 0.54% | 0.74% | 0.80% | 0.65% | 1.17% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSEW and QQQE have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQE has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to GSEW (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSEW dropped -38.65% vs QQQE's -32.14%.
On 5-year performance, QQQE leads with 10.25% vs 8.84% for GSEW. On fees, GSEW is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GSEW has been the lower-risk option at 2.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQE has performed better with a 10.25% return vs 8.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSEW is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for QQQE.
GSEW has the higher dividend yield at 1.41%, compared with 0.52% for QQQE.
GSEW is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QQQE is Nasdaq-100. GSEW tracks Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index, while QQQE tracks NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for GSEW and 0.35% for QQQE.
QQQE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSEW and QQQE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer