PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSEW vs. SWPPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSEW vs. SWPPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSEW achieves a 12.06% return, which is significantly higher than SWPPX's 9.35% return.


GSEW

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.50%
6M
9.23%
YTD
12.06%
1Y
17.95%
3Y*
15.44%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.82%

SWPPX

1D
1.70%
1M
-0.52%
6M
7.81%
YTD
9.35%
1Y
20.64%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
12.67%
10Y*
14.98%
ALL TIME*
9.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.73M$7.29M$6.34M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GSEW vs. SWPPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
12.06%11.97%16.89%17.80%-17.54%25.43%16.28%31.04%-8.11%7.72%
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
9.35%17.87%24.96%26.26%-18.14%28.67%18.38%31.46%-4.47%7.64%

Correlation

The correlation between GSEW and SWPPX is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2017

0.90

The correlation between GSEW and SWPPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GSEW vs. SWPPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSEW
SWPPX

Technology

18.3%
38.5%

Industrials

16.4%
8.4%

Financial Services

15.1%
11.6%

Healthcare

12.0%
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
9.5%

Utilities

5.9%
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
4.5%

Real Estate

4.3%
1.8%

Basic Materials

4.3%
1.7%

Energy

4.2%
3.0%

Communication Services

3.9%
9.9%

Technology

GSEW
18.3%
SWPPX
38.5%

Industrials

GSEW
16.4%
SWPPX
8.4%

Financial Services

GSEW
15.1%
SWPPX
11.6%

Healthcare

GSEW
12.0%
SWPPX
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

GSEW
9.9%
SWPPX
9.5%

Utilities

GSEW
5.9%
SWPPX
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

GSEW
5.7%
SWPPX
4.5%

Real Estate

GSEW
4.3%
SWPPX
1.8%

Basic Materials

GSEW
4.3%
SWPPX
1.7%

Energy

GSEW
4.2%
SWPPX
3.0%

Communication Services

GSEW
3.9%
SWPPX
9.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSEW vs. SWPPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GSEW
GSEW Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
GSEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSEW Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
GSEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSEW Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

SWPPX
SWPPX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SWPPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWPPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWPPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SWPPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWPPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GSEW vs. SWPPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSEWSWPPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.26

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

2.07

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.34

8.85

-0.51

GSEW vs. SWPPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSEW Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the SWPPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSEW and SWPPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSEW vs. SWPPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSEW drawdown since its inception was -38.65%, smaller than the maximum SWPPX drawdown of -55.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEW and SWPPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSEWSWPPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.65%

-55.06%

+16.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.72%

-8.89%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.18%

-18.74%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.74%

-24.51%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

-2.09%

+1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.80%

-9.90%

+4.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

2.07%

-0.07%

Volatility

GSEW vs. SWPPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) is 2.52%, while Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX) has a volatility of 3.49%. This indicates that GSEW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWPPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSEWSWPPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.52%

3.49%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.17%

10.13%

-0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.30%

12.89%

-0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.92%

17.05%

-0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.08%

18.23%

+0.85%

GSEW vs. SWPPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSEW has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SWPPX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GSEW vs. SWPPX - Dividend Comparison

GSEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, more than SWPPX's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
1.38%1.52%1.46%1.64%1.74%1.34%1.53%1.66%1.56%0.54%0.00%0.00%
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
1.01%1.11%1.23%1.43%1.67%1.27%1.81%1.95%2.67%1.79%2.55%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSEW and SWPPX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SWPPX has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to GSEW (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSEW dropped -38.65% vs SWPPX's -55.06%.

SWPPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSEW and SWPPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer