PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSIE vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSIE vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSIE achieves a 8.35% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 16.69% return. Over the past 10 years, GSIE has underperformed VEA with an annualized return of 9.97%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively higher 11.06% annualized return.


GSIE

1D
0.11%
1M
1.62%
YTD
8.35%
6M
8.45%
1Y
22.79%
3Y*
17.50%
5Y*
8.72%
10Y*
9.97%

VEA

1D
0.11%
1M
3.28%
YTD
16.69%
6M
17.33%
1Y
35.42%
3Y*
20.72%
5Y*
10.37%
10Y*
11.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSIE vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSIE
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
8.35%32.53%5.23%16.99%-15.86%13.27%7.45%22.83%-13.40%26.22%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
16.69%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between GSIE and VEA is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2015

0.98

The correlation between GSIE and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSIE vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSIE
VEA

Financial Services

26.4%
22.3%

Industrials

18.9%
17.5%

Technology

9.9%
16.6%

Healthcare

9.3%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.5%
5.5%

Basic Materials

6.2%
7.5%

Energy

4.6%
4.7%

Communication Services

4.1%
3.2%

Utilities

3.3%
3.0%

Real Estate

1.2%
2.5%

Financial Services

GSIE
26.4%
VEA
22.3%

Industrials

GSIE
18.9%
VEA
17.5%

Technology

GSIE
9.9%
VEA
16.6%

Healthcare

GSIE
9.3%
VEA
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

GSIE
8.7%
VEA
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

GSIE
7.5%
VEA
5.5%

Basic Materials

GSIE
6.2%
VEA
7.5%

Energy

GSIE
4.6%
VEA
4.7%

Communication Services

GSIE
4.1%
VEA
3.2%

Utilities

GSIE
3.3%
VEA
3.0%

Real Estate

GSIE
1.2%
VEA
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSIE vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSIE
GSIE Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
GSIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIE Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIE Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSIE vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSIEVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.39

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

3.06

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.03

11.80

-3.77

GSIE vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSIE Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSIE and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSIE vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSIE drawdown since its inception was -34.63%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIE and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSIEVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.63%

-60.68%

+26.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.76%

-11.63%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.07%

-13.45%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.97%

-29.71%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.63%

-35.73%

+1.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

0.00%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.04%

-13.26%

+7.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

3.01%

-0.17%

Volatility

GSIE vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) is 4.31%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 6.32%. This indicates that GSIE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSIEVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.31%

6.32%

-2.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.09%

14.39%

-2.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.49%

16.52%

-2.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.10%

16.71%

-0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.72%

17.38%

-0.66%

GSIE vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSIE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GSIE vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

GSIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, which matches VEA's 2.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSIE
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
2.48%2.65%3.11%2.87%3.01%2.40%1.60%2.80%2.68%2.31%2.15%0.13%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.50%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, GSIE and VEA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VEA has higher volatility (6.32%) compared to GSIE (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSIE dropped -34.63% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 10-year performance, VEA leads with 11.06% vs 9.97% for GSIE. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, GSIE has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VEA has performed better with a 11.06% return vs 9.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GSIE.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.50%, compared with 2.48% for GSIE.

GSIE tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GSIE and 0.03% for VEA.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSIE and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer