GSEW vs. QUS
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS).
GSEW and QUS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GSEW is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2017. QUS is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). It was launched on Apr 16, 2015. Both GSEW and QUS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GSEW or QUS.
Key characteristics
| GSEW | QUS | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 21.67% | 23.38% |
| 1Y Return | 37.22% | 32.97% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.52% | 9.68% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 12.45% | 13.96% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.11 | 3.32 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.34 | 4.67 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.56 | 1.63 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.50 | 5.89 |
| Martin Ratio | 19.85 | 21.97 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.87% | 1.50% |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.90% | 9.91% |
| Max Drawdown | -38.65% | -33.78% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.62% | -0.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSEW and QUS is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GSEW vs. QUS - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, GSEW achieves a 21.67% return, which is significantly lower than QUS's 23.38% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSEW vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSEW has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GSEW vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GSEW vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison
GSEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than QUS's 1.35% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSEW Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 1.44% | 1.64% | 1.73% | 1.34% | 1.53% | 1.65% | 1.56% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 1.35% | 1.57% | 1.68% | 1.27% | 1.73% | 1.81% | 2.12% | 1.86% | 2.07% | 1.48% |
Drawdowns
GSEW vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSEW drawdown since its inception was -38.65%, which is greater than QUS's maximum drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEW and QUS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GSEW vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) has a higher volatility of 3.79% compared to SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 3.31%. This indicates that GSEW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.