GSIE vs. DBAW

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW).

GSIE and DBAW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GSIE is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index. It was launched on Nov 6, 2015. DBAW is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Index. It was launched on Jan 23, 2014. Both GSIE and DBAW are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

GSIE vs. DBAW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GSIE vs. DBAW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GSIE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF	0.78%	32.53%	5.23%	16.99%	-15.86%	13.27%	7.45%	22.83%	-13.40%	26.22%
DBAW Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF	3.56%	26.47%	14.35%	16.26%	-13.35%	13.08%	7.44%	22.96%	-10.38%	18.79%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSIE achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly lower than DBAW's 3.56% return. Over the past 10 years, GSIE has underperformed DBAW with an annualized return of 8.84%, while DBAW has yielded a comparatively higher 10.42% annualized return.

GSIE

• 1D: 3.03%
• 1M: -7.23%
• YTD: 0.78%
• 6M: 5.81%
• 1Y: 24.47%
• 3Y*: 15.12%
• 5Y*: 8.28%
• 10Y*: 8.84%

DBAW

• 1D: 2.61%
• 1M: -5.70%
• YTD: 3.56%
• 6M: 10.45%
• 1Y: 25.67%
• 3Y*: 17.45%
• 5Y*: 9.50%
• 10Y*: 10.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSIE vs. DBAW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSIE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DBAW's 0.41% expense ratio.

DBAW

Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF

GSIE

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF

Return for Risk

GSIE vs. DBAW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSIE

GSIE Risk / Return Rank: 79
GSIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
GSIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
GSIE Omega Ratio Rank: 79
GSIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
GSIE Martin Ratio Rank: 80

DBAW

DBAW Risk / Return Rank: 84
DBAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
DBAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
DBAW Omega Ratio Rank: 88
DBAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
DBAW Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSIE vs. DBAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GSIE	DBAW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	1.61	-0.23
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	2.17	-0.16
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.36	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.17	2.13	+0.04
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.47	9.46	-0.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GSIE vs. DBAW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSIE Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the DBAW Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSIE and DBAW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GSIE	DBAW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.38	1.61	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	0.71	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	0.69	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.57	-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between GSIE and DBAW is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

GSIE vs. DBAW - Dividend Comparison

GSIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, less than DBAW's 3.69% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GSIE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF	2.66%	2.65%	3.11%	2.87%	3.01%	2.40%	1.60%	2.80%	2.68%	2.31%	2.15%	0.13%
DBAW Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF	3.69%	3.83%	1.70%	3.45%	8.81%	2.05%	2.08%	2.91%	2.93%	2.41%	1.99%	5.74%

Drawdowns

GSIE vs. DBAW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSIE drawdown since its inception was -34.63%, which is greater than DBAW's maximum drawdown of -31.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIE and DBAW.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSIE	DBAW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.63%	-31.44%	-3.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.76%	-11.78%	+1.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.97%	-17.87%	-12.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.63%	-31.44%	-3.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.45%	-6.12%	-1.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.11%	-5.05%	-1.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.76%	2.65%	+0.11%

Volatility

GSIE vs. DBAW - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) has a higher volatility of 7.38% compared to Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) at 6.84%. This indicates that GSIE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBAW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSIE	DBAW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.38%	6.84%	+0.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.54%	9.97%	+0.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.78%	16.03%	+1.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.92%	13.49%	+2.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.70%	15.23%	+1.47%