PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSEW vs. EUSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSEW vs. EUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GSEW having a 9.81% return and EUSA slightly lower at 9.38%.


GSEW

1D
0.17%
1M
2.26%
YTD
9.81%
6M
9.47%
1Y
18.75%
3Y*
16.29%
5Y*
9.06%
10Y*

EUSA

1D
0.47%
1M
2.52%
YTD
9.38%
6M
8.90%
1Y
18.49%
3Y*
14.76%
5Y*
8.22%
10Y*
11.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSEW vs. EUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
9.81%11.97%16.89%17.80%-17.54%25.43%16.28%31.04%-8.11%7.72%
EUSA
iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF
9.38%10.24%14.64%17.72%-17.13%25.60%15.03%30.56%-8.58%7.54%

Correlation

The correlation between GSEW and EUSA is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2017

0.98

The correlation between GSEW and EUSA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSEW vs. EUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSEW
EUSA

Technology

21.5%
20.3%

Industrials

15.5%
15.3%

Financial Services

14.1%
14.7%

Healthcare

11.3%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
11.1%

Utilities

5.6%
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
5.3%

Energy

4.6%
3.8%

Basic Materials

4.4%
4.3%

Real Estate

4.2%
5.2%

Communication Services

4.0%
4.0%

Technology

GSEW
21.5%
EUSA
20.3%

Industrials

GSEW
15.5%
EUSA
15.3%

Financial Services

GSEW
14.1%
EUSA
14.7%

Healthcare

GSEW
11.3%
EUSA
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

GSEW
9.4%
EUSA
11.1%

Utilities

GSEW
5.6%
EUSA
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

GSEW
5.5%
EUSA
5.3%

Energy

GSEW
4.6%
EUSA
3.8%

Basic Materials

GSEW
4.4%
EUSA
4.3%

Real Estate

GSEW
4.2%
EUSA
5.2%

Communication Services

GSEW
4.0%
EUSA
4.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSEW vs. EUSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSEW
GSEW Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
GSEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSEW Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
GSEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSEW Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

EUSA
EUSA Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
EUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
EUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSEW vs. EUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSEWEUSADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.27

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

2.39

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.43

9.43

0.00

GSEW vs. EUSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSEW Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the EUSA Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSEW and EUSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSEW vs. EUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSEW drawdown since its inception was -38.65%, roughly equal to the maximum EUSA drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEW and EUSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSEWEUSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.65%

-39.16%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.72%

-7.82%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.18%

-18.20%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.74%

-25.24%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.54%

-1.23%

-0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.86%

-4.59%

-1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

1.98%

+0.05%

Volatility

GSEW vs. EUSA - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) have volatilities of 3.98% and 3.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSEWEUSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

3.92%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.47%

9.11%

+0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.43%

12.08%

+0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.97%

17.00%

-0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.18%

18.36%

+0.82%

GSEW vs. EUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GSEW and EUSA have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GSEW vs. EUSA - Dividend Comparison

GSEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than EUSA's 1.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUSA
iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF
1.48%1.63%1.47%1.53%1.73%1.23%1.45%1.49%2.01%1.50%1.59%2.21%
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
1.42%1.52%1.46%1.64%1.74%1.34%1.53%1.66%1.56%0.54%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, GSEW and EUSA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GSEW has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to EUSA (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSEW dropped -38.65% vs EUSA's -39.16%.

On 5-year performance, GSEW leads with 9.06% vs 8.22% for EUSA. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GSEW has performed better with a 9.06% return vs 8.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSEW and EUSA have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

EUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 1.42% for GSEW.

GSEW is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while EUSA is Mid Cap Blend Equities. GSEW tracks Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index, while EUSA tracks MSCI USA Equal Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares.

EUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSEW and EUSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer