GSEW vs. EUSA
GSEW (Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF) and EUSA (iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSEW is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index, while EUSA is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Equal Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSEW returned 9.06%/yr vs 8.22%/yr for EUSA. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.09% expense ratio.
Performance
GSEW vs. EUSA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GSEW having a 9.81% return and EUSA slightly lower at 9.38%.
GSEW
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- 9.81%
- 6M
- 9.47%
- 1Y
- 18.75%
- 3Y*
- 16.29%
- 5Y*
- 9.06%
- 10Y*
- —
EUSA
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 2.52%
- YTD
- 9.38%
- 6M
- 8.90%
- 1Y
- 18.49%
- 3Y*
- 14.76%
- 5Y*
- 8.22%
- 10Y*
- 11.59%
GSEW vs. EUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSEW Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 9.81% | 11.97% | 16.89% | 17.80% | -17.54% | 25.43% | 16.28% | 31.04% | -8.11% | 7.72% |
EUSA iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF | 9.38% | 10.24% | 14.64% | 17.72% | -17.13% | 25.60% | 15.03% | 30.56% | -8.58% | 7.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSEW and EUSA is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2017 | 0.98 |
The correlation between GSEW and EUSA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSEW vs. EUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSEW
EUSA
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
Technology
GSEW
EUSA
Industrials
GSEW
EUSA
Financial Services
GSEW
EUSA
Healthcare
GSEW
EUSA
Consumer Cyclical
GSEW
EUSA
Utilities
GSEW
EUSA
Consumer Defensive
GSEW
EUSA
Energy
GSEW
EUSA
Basic Materials
GSEW
EUSA
Real Estate
GSEW
EUSA
Communication Services
GSEW
EUSA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSEW vs. EUSA — Risk / Return Rank
GSEW
EUSA
GSEW vs. EUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSEW | EUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.27 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 2.39 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.43 | 9.43 | 0.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSEW vs. EUSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSEW drawdown since its inception was -38.65%, roughly equal to the maximum EUSA drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEW and EUSA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSEW | EUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.65% | -39.16% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.72% | -7.82% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.18% | -18.20% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.74% | -25.24% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.54% | -1.23% | -0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.86% | -4.59% | -1.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 1.98% | +0.05% |
Volatility
GSEW vs. EUSA - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) have volatilities of 3.98% and 3.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSEW | EUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.98% | 3.92% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.47% | 9.11% | +0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.43% | 12.08% | +0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 17.00% | -0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.18% | 18.36% | +0.82% |
GSEW vs. EUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GSEW and EUSA have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSEW vs. EUSA - Dividend Comparison
GSEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than EUSA's 1.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUSA iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF | 1.48% | 1.63% | 1.47% | 1.53% | 1.73% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.49% | 2.01% | 1.50% | 1.59% | 2.21% |
GSEW Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 1.42% | 1.52% | 1.46% | 1.64% | 1.74% | 1.34% | 1.53% | 1.66% | 1.56% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, GSEW and EUSA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GSEW has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to EUSA (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSEW dropped -38.65% vs EUSA's -39.16%.
On 5-year performance, GSEW leads with 9.06% vs 8.22% for EUSA. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GSEW has performed better with a 9.06% return vs 8.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSEW and EUSA have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.
EUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 1.42% for GSEW.
GSEW is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while EUSA is Mid Cap Blend Equities. GSEW tracks Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index, while EUSA tracks MSCI USA Equal Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares.
EUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSEW and EUSA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer