GSIE vs. ICOW
GSIE (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF) and ICOW (Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - GSIE tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index while ICOW tracks the Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSIE returned 8.72%/yr vs 9.39%/yr for ICOW. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSIE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ICOW.
Performance
GSIE vs. ICOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSIE achieves a 8.35% return, which is significantly lower than ICOW's 10.95% return.
GSIE
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.45%
- 1Y
- 22.79%
- 3Y*
- 17.50%
- 5Y*
- 8.72%
- 10Y*
- 9.97%
ICOW
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -4.46%
- YTD
- 10.95%
- 6M
- 11.53%
- 1Y
- 30.42%
- 3Y*
- 17.69%
- 5Y*
- 9.39%
- 10Y*
- —
GSIE vs. ICOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF | 8.35% | 32.53% | 5.23% | 16.99% | -15.86% | 13.27% | 7.45% | 22.83% | -13.40% | 9.65% |
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 10.95% | 36.95% | -2.59% | 18.94% | -7.98% | 11.52% | 7.20% | 17.91% | -16.09% | 16.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSIE and ICOW is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2017 | 0.86 |
The correlation between GSIE and ICOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSIE vs. ICOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSIE
ICOW
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
GSIE
ICOW
-
Industrials
GSIE
ICOW
Technology
GSIE
ICOW
Healthcare
GSIE
ICOW
Consumer Cyclical
GSIE
ICOW
Consumer Defensive
GSIE
ICOW
Basic Materials
GSIE
ICOW
Energy
GSIE
ICOW
Communication Services
GSIE
ICOW
Utilities
GSIE
ICOW
-
Real Estate
GSIE
ICOW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSIE vs. ICOW — Risk / Return Rank
GSIE
ICOW
GSIE vs. ICOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSIE | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.37 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 3.81 | -1.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.03 | 12.73 | -4.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSIE vs. ICOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSIE drawdown since its inception was -34.63%, smaller than the maximum ICOW drawdown of -43.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIE and ICOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSIE | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.63% | -43.49% | +8.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.76% | -8.02% | -2.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.07% | -14.81% | +1.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.97% | -27.79% | -2.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | -6.06% | +5.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.04% | -7.56% | +1.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 2.40% | +0.44% |
Volatility
GSIE vs. ICOW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) is 4.31%, while Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) has a volatility of 5.67%. This indicates that GSIE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSIE | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 5.67% | -1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.09% | 11.71% | +0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.49% | 14.62% | -0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.10% | 16.75% | -0.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 18.50% | -1.78% |
GSIE vs. ICOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSIE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ICOW's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSIE vs. ICOW - Dividend Comparison
GSIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, more than ICOW's 2.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF | 2.48% | 2.65% | 3.11% | 2.87% | 3.01% | 2.40% | 1.60% | 2.80% | 2.68% | 2.31% | 2.15% | 0.13% |
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 2.30% | 3.03% | 4.39% | 3.61% | 5.26% | 2.11% | 2.46% | 3.10% | 2.61% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSIE and ICOW have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ICOW has higher volatility (5.67%) compared to GSIE (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSIE dropped -34.63% vs ICOW's -43.49%.
On 5-year performance, ICOW leads with 9.39% vs 8.72% for GSIE. On fees, GSIE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, GSIE has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ICOW has performed better with a 9.39% return vs 8.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSIE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ICOW.
GSIE has the higher dividend yield at 2.48%, compared with 2.30% for ICOW.
GSIE tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index, while ICOW tracks Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GSIE and 0.65% for ICOW.
ICOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSIE and ICOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer