GSEW vs. VUG
GSEW (Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSEW is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index, while VUG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSEW returned 8.48%/yr vs 12.80%/yr for VUG. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GSEW charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.
Performance
GSEW vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSEW achieves a 9.63% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 3.52% return.
GSEW
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- 9.63%
- 6M
- 8.43%
- 1Y
- 17.60%
- 3Y*
- 17.07%
- 5Y*
- 8.48%
- 10Y*
- —
VUG
- 1D
- -2.12%
- 1M
- -3.95%
- YTD
- 3.52%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- 20.05%
- 3Y*
- 22.74%
- 5Y*
- 12.80%
- 10Y*
- 18.02%
GSEW vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSEW Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 9.63% | 11.97% | 16.89% | 17.80% | -17.54% | 25.43% | 16.28% | 31.04% | -8.11% | 7.72% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 3.52% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | -33.16% | 27.35% | 40.25% | 37.03% | -3.32% | 6.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSEW and VUG is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2017 | 0.80 |
The correlation between GSEW and VUG shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GSEW vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSEW
VUG
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
Technology
GSEW
VUG
Industrials
GSEW
VUG
Financial Services
GSEW
VUG
Healthcare
GSEW
VUG
Consumer Cyclical
GSEW
VUG
Utilities
GSEW
VUG
Consumer Defensive
GSEW
VUG
Energy
GSEW
VUG
Basic Materials
GSEW
VUG
Real Estate
GSEW
VUG
Communication Services
GSEW
VUG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSEW vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
GSEW
VUG
GSEW vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSEW | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.21 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 1.22 | +1.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.68 | 4.15 | +4.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSEW vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSEW drawdown since its inception was -38.65%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEW and VUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSEW | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.65% | -50.68% | +12.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.72% | -16.53% | +8.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.18% | -22.85% | +4.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.74% | -35.61% | +9.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.70% | -6.88% | +5.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.86% | -7.09% | +1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 4.84% | -2.81% |
Volatility
GSEW vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) is 3.95%, while Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a volatility of 6.86%. This indicates that GSEW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSEW | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.95% | 6.86% | -2.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.48% | 13.44% | -3.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.45% | 16.91% | -4.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.96% | 22.39% | -5.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.17% | 21.51% | -2.34% |
GSEW vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSEW has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSEW vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
GSEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than VUG's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSEW Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 1.42% | 1.52% | 1.46% | 1.64% | 1.74% | 1.34% | 1.53% | 1.66% | 1.56% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.39% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSEW and VUG have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VUG has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to GSEW (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSEW dropped -38.65% vs VUG's -50.68%.
On 5-year performance, VUG leads with 12.80% vs 8.48% for GSEW. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, GSEW has been the lower-risk option at 3.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VUG has performed better with a 12.80% return vs 8.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for GSEW.
GSEW has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.39% for VUG.
GSEW is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. GSEW tracks Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for GSEW and 0.03% for VUG.
GSEW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSEW and VUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer