PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSEW vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSEW vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSEW achieves a 12.06% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 5.02% return.


GSEW

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.50%
6M
9.23%
YTD
12.06%
1Y
17.95%
3Y*
15.44%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.82%

VUG

1D
1.10%
1M
-0.35%
6M
6.39%
YTD
5.02%
1Y
15.36%
3Y*
21.19%
5Y*
12.16%
10Y*
17.38%
ALL TIME*
12.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.73M$7.29M$6.34M
$556.11M$661.72M$650.91M

GSEW vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
12.06%11.97%16.89%17.80%-17.54%25.43%16.28%31.04%-8.11%7.72%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
5.02%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-3.32%6.31%

Correlation

The correlation between GSEW and VUG is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2017

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between GSEW and VUG has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

GSEW vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSEW
VUG

Technology

18.3%
56.2%

Industrials

16.4%
5.3%

Financial Services

15.1%
3.8%

Healthcare

12.0%
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
11.5%

Utilities

5.9%
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
1.4%

Real Estate

4.3%
1.0%

Basic Materials

4.3%
0.5%

Energy

4.2%
0.3%

Communication Services

3.9%
15.4%

Technology

GSEW
18.3%
VUG
56.2%

Industrials

GSEW
16.4%
VUG
5.3%

Financial Services

GSEW
15.1%
VUG
3.8%

Healthcare

GSEW
12.0%
VUG
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

GSEW
9.9%
VUG
11.5%

Utilities

GSEW
5.9%
VUG
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

GSEW
5.7%
VUG
1.4%

Real Estate

GSEW
4.3%
VUG
1.0%

Basic Materials

GSEW
4.3%
VUG
0.5%

Energy

GSEW
4.2%
VUG
0.3%

Communication Services

GSEW
3.9%
VUG
15.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSEW vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GSEW
GSEW Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
GSEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSEW Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
GSEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSEW Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GSEW vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSEWVUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.13

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

0.78

+1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.34

2.47

+5.87

GSEW vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSEW Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is higher than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSEW and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSEW vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSEW drawdown since its inception was -38.65%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEW and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSEWVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.65%

-50.68%

+12.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.72%

-16.53%

+8.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.18%

-22.85%

+4.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.74%

-35.61%

+9.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

-5.53%

+4.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.80%

-7.08%

+1.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

5.20%

-3.20%

Volatility

GSEW vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) is 2.52%, while Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a volatility of 5.58%. This indicates that GSEW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSEWVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.52%

5.58%

-3.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.17%

14.24%

-5.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.30%

17.74%

-5.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.92%

22.49%

-5.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.08%

21.55%

-2.47%

GSEW vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSEW has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GSEW vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

GSEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, more than VUG's 0.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
1.38%1.52%1.46%1.64%1.74%1.34%1.53%1.66%1.56%0.54%0.00%0.00%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.40%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSEW and VUG have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VUG has higher volatility (5.58%) compared to GSEW (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSEW dropped -38.65% vs VUG's -50.68%.

On 5-year performance, VUG leads with 12.16% vs 8.49% for GSEW. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, GSEW has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VUG has performed better with a 12.16% return vs 8.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for GSEW.

GSEW has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.40% for VUG.

GSEW is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. GSEW tracks Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for GSEW and 0.03% for VUG.

GSEW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSEW and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer