GSIE vs. QEFA
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) and SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF (QEFA).
GSIE and QEFA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GSIE is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index. It was launched on Nov 6, 2015. QEFA is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Factor Mix A-Series (USD). It was launched on Jun 4, 2014. Both GSIE and QEFA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GSIE or QEFA.
Correlation
The correlation between GSIE and QEFA is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GSIE vs. QEFA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GSIE:
0.48
QEFA:
0.24
GSIE:
0.74
QEFA:
0.40
GSIE:
1.09
QEFA:
1.05
GSIE:
0.66
QEFA:
0.27
GSIE:
1.69
QEFA:
0.69
GSIE:
3.53%
QEFA:
4.02%
GSIE:
12.31%
QEFA:
11.69%
GSIE:
-34.63%
QEFA:
-31.71%
GSIE:
-7.45%
QEFA:
-9.23%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GSIE having a 0.51% return and QEFA slightly higher at 0.52%.
GSIE
0.51%
-1.93%
-2.36%
7.57%
4.49%
N/A
QEFA
0.52%
-2.00%
-4.41%
4.43%
4.19%
6.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSIE vs. QEFA - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSIE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QEFA's 0.30% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GSIE vs. QEFA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GSIE
QEFA
GSIE vs. QEFA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) and SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF (QEFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GSIE vs. QEFA - Dividend Comparison
GSIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, less than QEFA's 3.15% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF | 3.09% | 3.11% | 2.87% | 3.01% | 2.40% | 1.24% | 2.80% | 2.68% | 2.31% | 2.15% | 0.13% | 0.00% |
QEFA SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF | 3.15% | 3.17% | 2.79% | 3.02% | 2.37% | 1.82% | 2.95% | 3.22% | 2.34% | 2.01% | 2.94% | 1.14% |
Drawdowns
GSIE vs. QEFA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSIE drawdown since its inception was -34.63%, which is greater than QEFA's maximum drawdown of -31.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIE and QEFA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GSIE vs. QEFA - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) has a higher volatility of 3.68% compared to SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF (QEFA) at 3.30%. This indicates that GSIE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QEFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.