GSIE vs. SCHF
GSIE (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF) and SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - GSIE tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index while SCHF tracks the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GSIE returned 9.97%/yr vs 11.18%/yr for SCHF. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GSIE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHF.
Performance
GSIE vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSIE achieves a 8.35% return, which is significantly lower than SCHF's 17.68% return. Over the past 10 years, GSIE has underperformed SCHF with an annualized return of 9.97%, while SCHF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.18% annualized return.
GSIE
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.45%
- 1Y
- 22.79%
- 3Y*
- 17.50%
- 5Y*
- 8.72%
- 10Y*
- 9.97%
SCHF
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 3.82%
- YTD
- 17.68%
- 6M
- 18.27%
- 1Y
- 36.30%
- 3Y*
- 20.89%
- 5Y*
- 10.67%
- 10Y*
- 11.18%
GSIE vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF | 8.35% | 32.53% | 5.23% | 16.99% | -15.86% | 13.27% | 7.45% | 22.83% | -13.40% | 26.22% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 17.68% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 18.35% | -14.80% | 11.40% | 9.48% | 22.26% | -14.29% | 26.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSIE and SCHF is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2015 | 0.98 |
The correlation between GSIE and SCHF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSIE vs. SCHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSIE
SCHF
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
GSIE
SCHF
Industrials
GSIE
SCHF
Technology
GSIE
SCHF
Healthcare
GSIE
SCHF
Consumer Cyclical
GSIE
SCHF
Consumer Defensive
GSIE
SCHF
Basic Materials
GSIE
SCHF
Energy
GSIE
SCHF
Communication Services
GSIE
SCHF
Utilities
GSIE
SCHF
Real Estate
GSIE
SCHF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSIE vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank
GSIE
SCHF
GSIE vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSIE | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.40 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 3.18 | -1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.03 | 12.22 | -4.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSIE vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSIE drawdown since its inception was -34.63%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHF drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIE and SCHF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSIE | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.63% | -34.87% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.76% | -11.48% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.07% | -13.41% | +0.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.97% | -29.14% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.63% | -34.87% | +0.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | 0.00% | -0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.04% | -7.36% | +1.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 2.98% | -0.14% |
Volatility
GSIE vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) is 4.31%, while Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a volatility of 6.42%. This indicates that GSIE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSIE | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 6.42% | -2.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.09% | 14.43% | -2.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.49% | 16.63% | -2.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.10% | 16.55% | -0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 17.21% | -0.49% |
GSIE vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSIE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSIE vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison
GSIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than SCHF's 2.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF | 2.48% | 2.65% | 3.11% | 2.87% | 3.01% | 2.40% | 1.60% | 2.80% | 2.68% | 2.31% | 2.15% | 0.13% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 2.90% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, GSIE and SCHF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHF has higher volatility (6.42%) compared to GSIE (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSIE dropped -34.63% vs SCHF's -34.87%.
On 10-year performance, SCHF leads with 11.18% vs 9.97% for GSIE. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, GSIE has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHF has performed better with a 11.18% return vs 9.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GSIE.
SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 2.48% for GSIE.
GSIE tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index, while SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GSIE and 0.06% for SCHF.
SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSIE and SCHF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer