PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLQL vs. LVHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLQL vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) and Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLQL achieves a 11.18% return, which is significantly higher than LVHD's 10.55% return.


FLQL

1D
-1.38%
1M
-0.31%
YTD
11.18%
6M
9.76%
1Y
26.76%
3Y*
22.29%
5Y*
14.33%
10Y*

LVHD

1D
1.56%
1M
1.00%
YTD
10.55%
6M
10.56%
1Y
13.38%
3Y*
10.78%
5Y*
7.44%
10Y*
8.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLQL vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLQL
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF
11.18%19.64%24.33%23.58%-14.83%26.58%10.67%29.09%-2.79%15.04%
LVHD
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
10.55%7.50%10.18%-0.95%-1.82%26.90%-1.28%22.91%-5.58%7.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FLQL and LVHD is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2017

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between FLQL and LVHD has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FLQL vs. LVHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLQL
LVHD

Technology

37.0%
3.1%

Communication Services

11.7%
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
7.4%

Healthcare

10.1%
4.4%

Financial Services

9.6%
8.2%

Industrials

9.5%
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
21.8%

Real Estate

2.7%
15.4%

Basic Materials

1.7%

-

Utilities

1.4%
24.8%

Energy

0.9%
7.4%

Technology

FLQL
37.0%
LVHD
3.1%

Communication Services

FLQL
11.7%
LVHD
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FLQL
11.3%
LVHD
7.4%

Healthcare

FLQL
10.1%
LVHD
4.4%

Financial Services

FLQL
9.6%
LVHD
8.2%

Industrials

FLQL
9.5%
LVHD
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

FLQL
4.1%
LVHD
21.8%

Real Estate

FLQL
2.7%
LVHD
15.4%

Basic Materials

FLQL
1.7%
LVHD

-

Utilities

FLQL
1.4%
LVHD
24.8%

Energy

FLQL
0.9%
LVHD
7.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLQL vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLQL
FLQL Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FLQL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLQL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLQL Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FLQL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLQL Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

LVHD
LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLQL vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) and Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLQLLVHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.23

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

2.18

+0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.71

5.41

+8.29

FLQL vs. LVHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLQL Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is higher than the LVHD Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLQL and LVHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLQL vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLQL drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, smaller than the maximum LVHD drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQL and LVHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLQLLVHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.64%

-37.32%

+3.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.05%

-6.17%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.32%

-14.29%

-5.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.41%

-16.75%

-4.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-1.43%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.03%

-4.04%

+0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

2.48%

-0.52%

Volatility

FLQL vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison

Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) has a higher volatility of 4.83% compared to Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) at 4.05%. This indicates that FLQL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLQLLVHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.83%

4.05%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.94%

7.26%

+3.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.47%

9.98%

+3.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.22%

12.91%

+3.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.52%

15.53%

+1.99%

FLQL vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLQL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLQL vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison

FLQL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than LVHD's 3.29% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLQL
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF
1.02%1.10%1.13%1.50%2.07%1.81%1.99%1.78%1.82%1.22%0.00%
LVHD
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
3.29%3.35%4.23%3.55%3.30%2.56%3.27%3.30%3.82%3.33%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLQL and LVHD have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLQL has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to LVHD (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLQL dropped -33.64% vs LVHD's -37.32%.

On 5-year performance, FLQL leads with 14.33% vs 7.44% for LVHD. On fees, FLQL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, LVHD has been the lower-risk option at 4.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLQL has performed better with a 14.33% return vs 7.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLQL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for LVHD.

LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 1.02% for FLQL.

FLQL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while LVHD is Dividend. FLQL tracks LibertyQ U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while LVHD tracks Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FLQL and 0.27% for LVHD.

FLQL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLQL and LVHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer