PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLQL vs. VIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLQL vs. VIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLQL achieves a 12.74% return, which is significantly higher than VIG's 7.53% return.


FLQL

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.08%
YTD
12.74%
6M
11.77%
1Y
30.10%
3Y*
22.86%
5Y*
14.80%
10Y*

VIG

1D
0.09%
1M
0.99%
YTD
7.53%
6M
6.96%
1Y
20.27%
3Y*
16.05%
5Y*
11.07%
10Y*
13.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLQL vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLQL
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF
12.74%19.64%24.33%23.58%-14.83%26.58%10.67%29.09%-2.79%15.04%
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
7.53%14.17%16.99%14.51%-9.80%23.76%15.43%29.62%-2.08%12.79%

Correlation

The correlation between FLQL and VIG is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2017

0.86

The correlation between FLQL and VIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLQL vs. VIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLQL
VIG

Technology

37.0%
29.0%

Communication Services

11.7%
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
4.4%

Healthcare

10.1%
16.6%

Financial Services

9.6%
19.9%

Industrials

9.5%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
9.3%

Real Estate

2.7%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%
3.3%

Utilities

1.4%
2.9%

Energy

0.9%
3.2%

Technology

FLQL
37.0%
VIG
29.0%

Communication Services

FLQL
11.7%
VIG
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FLQL
11.3%
VIG
4.4%

Healthcare

FLQL
10.1%
VIG
16.6%

Financial Services

FLQL
9.6%
VIG
19.9%

Industrials

FLQL
9.5%
VIG
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

FLQL
4.1%
VIG
9.3%

Real Estate

FLQL
2.7%
VIG

-

Basic Materials

FLQL
1.7%
VIG
3.3%

Utilities

FLQL
1.4%
VIG
2.9%

Energy

FLQL
0.9%
VIG
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLQL vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLQL
FLQL Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FLQL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLQL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLQL Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FLQL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLQL Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

VIG
VIG Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIG Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
VIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIG Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLQL vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLQLVIGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.36

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

2.57

+0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.45

10.39

+5.06

FLQL vs. VIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLQL Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the VIG Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLQL and VIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLQL vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLQL drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, smaller than the maximum VIG drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQL and VIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLQLVIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.64%

-46.81%

+13.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.05%

-7.91%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.32%

-14.95%

-4.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.41%

-20.39%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-0.62%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.03%

-5.50%

+1.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

1.96%

-0.01%

Volatility

FLQL vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison

Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) at 2.82%. This indicates that FLQL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLQLVIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

2.82%

+1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.87%

7.68%

+3.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.42%

10.14%

+3.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.21%

14.23%

+1.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.51%

16.07%

+1.44%

FLQL vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLQL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLQL vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison

FLQL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than VIG's 1.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLQL
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF
1.01%1.10%1.13%1.50%2.07%1.81%1.99%1.78%1.82%1.22%0.00%0.00%
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
1.47%1.62%1.73%1.88%1.96%1.55%1.63%1.71%2.08%1.88%2.14%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLQL and VIG have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLQL has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to VIG (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLQL dropped -33.64% vs VIG's -46.81%.

On 5-year performance, FLQL leads with 14.80% vs 11.07% for VIG. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLQL has performed better with a 14.80% return vs 11.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FLQL.

VIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 1.01% for FLQL.

FLQL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VIG is Dividend. FLQL tracks LibertyQ U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FLQL and 0.04% for VIG.

FLQL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLQL and VIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer