PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LVHD vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LVHD vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVHD achieves a 13.58% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 24.03% return. Over the past 10 years, LVHD has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 8.26%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.76% annualized return.


LVHD

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.55%
6M
7.65%
YTD
13.58%
1Y
14.84%
3Y*
9.83%
5Y*
7.39%
10Y*
8.26%
ALL TIME*
9.16%

SCHD

1D
0.18%
1M
3.33%
6M
14.09%
YTD
24.03%
1Y
31.54%
3Y*
14.19%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*
12.76%
ALL TIME*
13.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.24M$2.50M$2.89M
$786.88M$715.86M$685.58M

LVHD vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LVHD
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
13.58%7.50%10.18%-0.95%-1.82%26.90%-1.28%22.91%-5.58%14.25%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
24.03%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between LVHD and SCHD is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2015

0.82

The correlation between LVHD and SCHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

LVHD vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LVHD
SCHD

Utilities

24.8%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

21.8%
20.6%

Real Estate

15.4%

-

Financial Services

8.6%
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
7.7%

Energy

7.0%
14.1%

Industrials

4.9%
7.8%

Healthcare

4.7%
20.8%

Technology

3.1%
12.7%

Communication Services

2.2%
6.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.2%

Utilities

LVHD
24.8%
SCHD
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

LVHD
21.8%
SCHD
20.6%

Real Estate

LVHD
15.4%
SCHD

-

Financial Services

LVHD
8.6%
SCHD
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

LVHD
7.5%
SCHD
7.7%

Energy

LVHD
7.0%
SCHD
14.1%

Industrials

LVHD
4.9%
SCHD
7.8%

Healthcare

LVHD
4.7%
SCHD
20.8%

Technology

LVHD
3.1%
SCHD
12.7%

Communication Services

LVHD
2.2%
SCHD
6.2%

Basic Materials

LVHD

-

SCHD
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LVHD vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LVHD
LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LVHD vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LVHDSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.51

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

6.74

-4.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.96

17.01

-11.05

LVHD vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVHD Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVHD and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LVHD vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVHD drawdown since its inception was -37.32%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHD and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LVHDSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.32%

-33.37%

-3.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.17%

-4.61%

-1.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.94%

-16.13%

+4.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.75%

-16.85%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

-33.37%

-3.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.12%

-1.24%

-0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-3.30%

-0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

1.82%

+0.67%

Volatility

LVHD vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) has a higher volatility of 4.75% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 4.11%. This indicates that LVHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LVHDSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.75%

4.11%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.37%

8.11%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.54%

11.13%

-0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.05%

14.39%

-1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.57%

16.72%

-1.15%

LVHD vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVHD has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LVHD vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

LVHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, more than SCHD's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LVHD
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
3.20%3.35%4.23%3.55%3.30%2.56%3.27%3.30%3.82%3.33%2.48%0.00%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.13%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


LVHD and SCHD have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LVHD has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to SCHD (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHD dropped -37.32% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.76% vs 8.26% for LVHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.76% return vs 8.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for LVHD.

LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 3.13% for SCHD.

LVHD tracks Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for LVHD and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LVHD and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer