PortfoliosLab logo
FLQL vs. OMFL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FLQL and OMFL is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

FLQL vs. OMFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FLQL:

0.69

OMFL:

0.25

Sortino Ratio

FLQL:

1.11

OMFL:

0.49

Omega Ratio

FLQL:

1.16

OMFL:

1.06

Calmar Ratio

FLQL:

0.73

OMFL:

0.30

Martin Ratio

FLQL:

2.77

OMFL:

0.93

Ulcer Index

FLQL:

5.11%

OMFL:

4.98%

Daily Std Dev

FLQL:

19.87%

OMFL:

18.24%

Max Drawdown

FLQL:

-33.64%

OMFL:

-33.24%

Current Drawdown

FLQL:

-2.84%

OMFL:

-1.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLQL achieves a 3.12% return, which is significantly lower than OMFL's 4.08% return.


FLQL

YTD

3.12%

1M

12.72%

6M

2.59%

1Y

13.66%

3Y*

16.70%

5Y*

16.27%

10Y*

N/A

OMFL

YTD

4.08%

1M

9.79%

6M

4.21%

1Y

4.61%

3Y*

10.88%

5Y*

14.62%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLQL vs. OMFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLQL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than OMFL's 0.29% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FLQL vs. OMFL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLQL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLQL is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLQL is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLQL is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLQL is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLQL is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLQL is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

OMFL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of OMFL is 3232
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of OMFL is 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of OMFL is 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of OMFL is 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of OMFL is 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of OMFL is 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FLQL vs. OMFL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FLQL Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is higher than the OMFL Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLQL and OMFL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

FLQL vs. OMFL - Dividend Comparison

FLQL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than OMFL's 0.95% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
FLQL
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF
1.14%1.13%1.50%2.07%1.81%1.99%1.78%1.82%1.22%
OMFL
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
0.95%1.22%1.37%1.55%0.95%1.48%1.53%1.39%0.32%

Drawdowns

FLQL vs. OMFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLQL drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, roughly equal to the maximum OMFL drawdown of -33.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQL and OMFL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FLQL vs. OMFL - Volatility Comparison

Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) at 3.90%. This indicates that FLQL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...