PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLQL vs. OMFL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLQL vs. OMFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLQL vs. OMFL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLQL
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF
-2.22%19.64%24.33%23.58%-14.83%26.58%10.67%29.09%-2.79%5.40%
OMFL
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
-1.41%13.68%6.82%21.53%-13.97%28.95%20.91%35.58%-2.55%4.95%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLQL achieves a -2.22% return, which is significantly lower than OMFL's -1.41% return.


FLQL

1D
3.25%
1M
-4.91%
YTD
-2.22%
6M
-0.56%
1Y
21.26%
3Y*
19.32%
5Y*
12.59%
10Y*

OMFL

1D
2.58%
1M
-4.32%
YTD
-1.41%
6M
0.27%
1Y
13.76%
3Y*
10.17%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLQL vs. OMFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLQL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than OMFL's 0.29% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FLQL vs. OMFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLQL
FLQL Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FLQL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLQL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLQL Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FLQL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLQL Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

OMFL
OMFL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
OMFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OMFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
OMFL Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
OMFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
OMFL Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLQL vs. OMFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLQLOMFLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.15

0.83

+0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.72

1.28

+0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.18

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

1.49

+0.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.82

7.05

+1.77

FLQL vs. OMFL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLQL Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is higher than the OMFL Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLQL and OMFL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLQLOMFLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

0.83

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.45

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.63

+0.15

Correlation

The correlation between FLQL and OMFL is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FLQL vs. OMFL - Dividend Comparison

FLQL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than OMFL's 0.86% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLQL
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF
1.16%1.10%1.13%1.50%2.07%1.81%1.99%1.78%1.82%1.22%
OMFL
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
0.86%0.80%1.22%1.37%1.55%0.95%1.48%1.53%1.39%0.32%

Drawdowns

FLQL vs. OMFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLQL drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, roughly equal to the maximum OMFL drawdown of -33.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQL and OMFL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLQLOMFLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.64%

-33.24%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.12%

-10.00%

-2.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.41%

-22.44%

+1.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.09%

-5.20%

-0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.11%

-4.89%

+0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

2.11%

+0.39%

Volatility

FLQL vs. OMFL - Volatility Comparison

Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) has a higher volatility of 5.97% compared to Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) at 5.24%. This indicates that FLQL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLQLOMFLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.97%

5.24%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.38%

10.02%

+0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.56%

16.72%

+1.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.06%

16.82%

-0.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.57%

20.26%

-2.69%