PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LVHD vs. SPHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LVHD vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVHD achieves a 6.87% return, which is significantly higher than SPHD's 5.32% return. Over the past 10 years, LVHD has outperformed SPHD with an annualized return of 8.05%, while SPHD has yielded a comparatively lower 7.18% annualized return.


LVHD

1D
0.65%
1M
-1.96%
YTD
6.87%
6M
7.02%
1Y
9.87%
3Y*
9.38%
5Y*
6.16%
10Y*
8.05%

SPHD

1D
0.71%
1M
-0.75%
YTD
5.32%
6M
5.99%
1Y
9.22%
3Y*
11.75%
5Y*
5.73%
10Y*
7.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LVHD vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LVHD
Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
6.87%7.50%10.18%-0.95%-1.82%26.90%-1.28%22.91%-5.58%14.25%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
5.32%3.41%18.08%1.32%0.58%24.98%-9.98%20.26%-6.17%11.90%

Correlation

The correlation between LVHD and SPHD is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2015

0.91

The correlation between LVHD and SPHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

LVHD vs. SPHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LVHD
SPHD

Utilities

25.5%
13.7%

Consumer Defensive

18.5%
17.8%

Real Estate

15.0%
20.1%

Financial Services

8.6%
15.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.8%
3.4%

Energy

6.7%
14.1%

Technology

5.9%
1.5%

Industrials

4.6%
0.0%

Healthcare

4.6%
5.1%

Communication Services

3.8%
8.6%

Basic Materials

-

-

Utilities

LVHD
25.5%
SPHD
13.7%

Consumer Defensive

LVHD
18.5%
SPHD
17.8%

Real Estate

LVHD
15.0%
SPHD
20.1%

Financial Services

LVHD
8.6%
SPHD
15.6%

Consumer Cyclical

LVHD
6.8%
SPHD
3.4%

Energy

LVHD
6.7%
SPHD
14.1%

Technology

LVHD
5.9%
SPHD
1.5%

Industrials

LVHD
4.6%
SPHD
0.0%

Healthcare

LVHD
4.6%
SPHD
5.1%

Communication Services

LVHD
3.8%
SPHD
8.6%

Basic Materials

LVHD

-

SPHD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LVHD vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LVHD
LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHD
SPHD Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
SPHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHD Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHD Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVHD vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LVHDSPHDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.04

0.84

+0.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.55

1.30

+0.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.15

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

1.25

+0.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.11

3.16

+0.96

LVHD vs. SPHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVHD Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is comparable to the SPHD Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVHD and SPHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LVHDSPHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

0.84

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.41

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.41

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.58

-0.02

Drawdowns

LVHD vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVHD drawdown since its inception was -37.32%, smaller than the maximum SPHD drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHD and SPHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LVHDSPHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.32%

-41.39%

+4.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.17%

-7.33%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.29%

-13.29%

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.75%

-19.50%

+2.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

-41.39%

+4.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.70%

-4.53%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-4.70%

+0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.40%

2.91%

-0.51%

Volatility

LVHD vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison

Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) have volatilities of 2.97% and 2.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LVHDSPHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

2.97%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.73%

7.54%

-0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.52%

11.00%

-1.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.87%

14.16%

-1.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.51%

17.64%

-2.13%

LVHD vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVHD has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

LVHD vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison

LVHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, less than SPHD's 4.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LVHD
Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
3.40%3.35%4.23%3.55%3.30%2.56%3.27%3.30%3.82%3.33%2.48%0.00%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.58%4.02%3.41%4.48%3.89%3.45%4.89%4.07%4.40%3.14%3.83%3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, LVHD and SPHD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPHD has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to LVHD (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHD dropped -37.32% vs SPHD's -41.39%.

On 10-year performance, LVHD leads with 8.05% vs 7.18% for SPHD. On fees, LVHD is cheaper at 0.27% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, LVHD has performed better with a 8.05% return vs 7.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LVHD is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SPHD.

SPHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 3.40% for LVHD.

LVHD is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while SPHD is S&P 500. LVHD tracks QS Low Volatility High Dividend Index, while SPHD tracks S&P Low Volatility High Dividend index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for LVHD and 0.30% for SPHD.

LVHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LVHD and SPHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer