LVHD vs. DGRO
Compare and contrast key facts about Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO).
LVHD and DGRO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LVHD is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the QS Low Volatility High Dividend Index. It was launched on Dec 29, 2015. DGRO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. It was launched on Jun 10, 2014. Both LVHD and DGRO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LVHD or DGRO.
Key characteristics
| LVHD | DGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 14.31% | 20.38% |
| 1Y Return | 25.73% | 31.55% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.65% | 8.19% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.46% | 12.05% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.22 | 3.23 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.16 | 4.57 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.41 | 1.60 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.78 | 4.06 |
| Martin Ratio | 10.67 | 21.73 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.35% | 1.44% |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.30% | 9.68% |
| Max Drawdown | -37.32% | -35.10% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.76% | -0.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVHD and DGRO is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
LVHD vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, LVHD achieves a 14.31% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 20.38% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LVHD vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVHD has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LVHD vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LVHD vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
LVHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, more than DGRO's 2.16% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHD Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF | 3.71% | 3.55% | 3.30% | 2.56% | 3.27% | 3.30% | 3.81% | 3.33% | 2.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 2.16% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% | 0.97% |
Drawdowns
LVHD vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVHD drawdown since its inception was -37.32%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHD and DGRO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LVHD vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) is 3.08%, while iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) has a volatility of 3.29%. This indicates that LVHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.