PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLQL vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLQL vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLQL achieves a 12.74% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 9.75% return.


FLQL

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.08%
YTD
12.74%
6M
11.77%
1Y
30.10%
3Y*
22.86%
5Y*
14.80%
10Y*

VOO

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.08%
YTD
9.75%
6M
9.30%
1Y
26.77%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
15.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLQL vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLQL
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF
12.74%19.64%24.33%23.58%-14.83%26.58%10.67%29.09%-2.79%15.04%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
9.75%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%13.62%

Correlation

The correlation between FLQL and VOO is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2017

0.90

The correlation between FLQL and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLQL vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLQL
VOO

Technology

37.0%
39.1%

Communication Services

11.7%
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
9.8%

Healthcare

10.1%
8.3%

Financial Services

9.6%
10.9%

Industrials

9.5%
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
4.5%

Real Estate

2.7%
1.8%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.7%

Utilities

1.4%
2.5%

Energy

0.9%
3.2%

Technology

FLQL
37.0%
VOO
39.1%

Communication Services

FLQL
11.7%
VOO
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FLQL
11.3%
VOO
9.8%

Healthcare

FLQL
10.1%
VOO
8.3%

Financial Services

FLQL
9.6%
VOO
10.9%

Industrials

FLQL
9.5%
VOO
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

FLQL
4.1%
VOO
4.5%

Real Estate

FLQL
2.7%
VOO
1.8%

Basic Materials

FLQL
1.7%
VOO
1.7%

Utilities

FLQL
1.4%
VOO
2.5%

Energy

FLQL
0.9%
VOO
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLQL vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLQL
FLQL Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FLQL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLQL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLQL Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FLQL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLQL Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLQL vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLQLVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.39

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

3.02

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.45

13.58

+1.87

FLQL vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLQL Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLQL and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLQL vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLQL drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, roughly equal to the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQL and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLQLVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.64%

-33.99%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.05%

-8.90%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.32%

-18.69%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.41%

-24.52%

+3.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-1.74%

+1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.03%

-3.68%

-0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

1.98%

-0.03%

Volatility

FLQL vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) have volatilities of 4.61% and 4.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLQLVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

4.60%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.87%

9.73%

+1.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.42%

12.39%

+1.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.21%

16.90%

-0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.51%

18.05%

-0.54%

FLQL vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLQL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLQL vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

FLQL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than VOO's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLQL
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF
1.01%1.10%1.13%1.50%2.07%1.81%1.99%1.78%1.82%1.22%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.04%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FLQL and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FLQL has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to VOO (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLQL dropped -33.64% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 5-year performance, FLQL leads with 14.80% vs 13.58% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLQL has performed better with a 14.80% return vs 13.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FLQL.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 1.01% for FLQL.

FLQL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. FLQL tracks LibertyQ U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FLQL and 0.03% for VOO.

FLQL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLQL and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer