FLQL vs. VOO
FLQL (Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLQL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the LibertyQ U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLQL returned 14.80%/yr vs 13.58%/yr for VOO. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLQL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
FLQL vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLQL achieves a 12.74% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 9.75% return.
FLQL
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 12.74%
- 6M
- 11.77%
- 1Y
- 30.10%
- 3Y*
- 22.86%
- 5Y*
- 14.80%
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 9.30%
- 1Y
- 26.77%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 15.77%
FLQL vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLQL Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF | 12.74% | 19.64% | 24.33% | 23.58% | -14.83% | 26.58% | 10.67% | 29.09% | -2.79% | 15.04% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.75% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 13.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLQL and VOO is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2017 | 0.90 |
The correlation between FLQL and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLQL vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLQL
VOO
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Technology
FLQL
VOO
Communication Services
FLQL
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
FLQL
VOO
Healthcare
FLQL
VOO
Financial Services
FLQL
VOO
Industrials
FLQL
VOO
Consumer Defensive
FLQL
VOO
Real Estate
FLQL
VOO
Basic Materials
FLQL
VOO
Utilities
FLQL
VOO
Energy
FLQL
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLQL vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
FLQL
VOO
FLQL vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLQL | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.39 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 3.02 | +0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.45 | 13.58 | +1.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLQL vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLQL drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, roughly equal to the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQL and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLQL | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.64% | -33.99% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.05% | -8.90% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.32% | -18.69% | -0.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.41% | -24.52% | +3.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | -1.74% | +1.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.03% | -3.68% | -0.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 1.98% | -0.03% |
Volatility
FLQL vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) have volatilities of 4.61% and 4.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLQL | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.61% | 4.60% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.87% | 9.73% | +1.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.42% | 12.39% | +1.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.21% | 16.90% | -0.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.51% | 18.05% | -0.54% |
FLQL vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLQL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLQL vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
FLQL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than VOO's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLQL Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF | 1.01% | 1.10% | 1.13% | 1.50% | 2.07% | 1.81% | 1.99% | 1.78% | 1.82% | 1.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.04% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, FLQL and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FLQL has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to VOO (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLQL dropped -33.64% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 5-year performance, FLQL leads with 14.80% vs 13.58% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLQL has performed better with a 14.80% return vs 13.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FLQL.
VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 1.01% for FLQL.
FLQL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. FLQL tracks LibertyQ U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FLQL and 0.03% for VOO.
FLQL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLQL and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer