LVHD vs. BLV
Compare and contrast key facts about Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) and Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV).
LVHD and BLV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LVHD is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the QS Low Volatility High Dividend Index. It was launched on Dec 29, 2015. BLV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. Long Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2007. Both LVHD and BLV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LVHD or BLV.
Correlation
The correlation between LVHD and BLV is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
LVHD vs. BLV - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
LVHD:
1.35
BLV:
0.45
LVHD:
1.89
BLV:
0.70
LVHD:
1.24
BLV:
1.08
LVHD:
1.70
BLV:
0.15
LVHD:
5.30
BLV:
0.95
LVHD:
2.86%
BLV:
5.21%
LVHD:
11.23%
BLV:
11.03%
LVHD:
-37.32%
BLV:
-38.29%
LVHD:
-1.80%
BLV:
-25.84%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVHD achieves a 5.18% return, which is significantly higher than BLV's 4.75% return.
LVHD
5.18%
-0.35%
1.62%
15.81%
14.53%
N/A
BLV
4.75%
0.24%
-2.50%
4.95%
-3.57%
1.09%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LVHD vs. BLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVHD has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than BLV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LVHD vs. BLV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
LVHD
BLV
LVHD vs. BLV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) and Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LVHD vs. BLV - Dividend Comparison
LVHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, less than BLV's 4.51% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHD Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF | 3.85% | 4.23% | 3.55% | 3.30% | 2.56% | 3.27% | 3.30% | 3.82% | 3.33% | 2.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BLV Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF | 4.51% | 4.68% | 4.06% | 4.17% | 3.37% | 5.84% | 3.57% | 4.07% | 3.63% | 4.16% | 4.37% | 3.90% |
Drawdowns
LVHD vs. BLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVHD drawdown since its inception was -37.32%, roughly equal to the maximum BLV drawdown of -38.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHD and BLV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LVHD vs. BLV - Volatility Comparison
Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV) at 2.48%. This indicates that LVHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.