LVHD vs. BLV
LVHD (Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) and BLV (Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LVHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index, while BLV is a Long-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Long Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LVHD returned 8.26%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for BLV. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. LVHD charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BLV.
Performance
LVHD vs. BLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVHD achieves a 13.58% return, which is significantly higher than BLV's -2.81% return. Over the past 10 years, LVHD has outperformed BLV with an annualized return of 8.26%, while BLV has yielded a comparatively lower 0.27% annualized return.
LVHD
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.55%
- 6M
- 7.65%
- YTD
- 13.58%
- 1Y
- 14.84%
- 3Y*
- 9.83%
- 5Y*
- 7.39%
- 10Y*
- 8.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.16%
BLV
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -3.57%
- 6M
- -2.98%
- YTD
- -2.81%
- 1Y
- -0.73%
- 3Y*
- 1.49%
- 5Y*
- -5.04%
- 10Y*
- 0.27%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.03%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $48.82M | $52.31M | $45.06M | |
| $2.24M | $2.50M | $2.89M |
LVHD vs. BLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHD Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 13.58% | 7.50% | 10.18% | -0.95% | -1.82% | 26.90% | -1.28% | 22.91% | -5.58% | 14.25% |
BLV Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF | -2.81% | 6.44% | -3.65% | 7.35% | -26.95% | -2.89% | 16.13% | 18.99% | -4.17% | 10.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVHD and BLV is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2015 | 0.12 |
The correlation between LVHD and BLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.30 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVHD vs. BLV — Risk / Return Rank
LVHD
BLV
LVHD vs. BLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) and Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LVHD | BLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.02 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 0.07 | +2.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.96 | 0.16 | +5.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LVHD vs. BLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVHD drawdown since its inception was -37.32%, roughly equal to the maximum BLV drawdown of -38.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHD and BLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVHD | BLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.32% | -38.29% | +0.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.17% | -5.92% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.87% | -11.70% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.75% | -36.27% | +19.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.32% | -38.29% | +0.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.12% | -26.48% | +24.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.00% | -9.63% | +5.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 2.63% | -0.14% |
Volatility
LVHD vs. BLV - Volatility Comparison
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) has a higher volatility of 4.75% compared to Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV) at 2.12%. This indicates that LVHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVHD | BLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.75% | 2.12% | +2.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.37% | 5.96% | +2.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.54% | 7.83% | +2.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.05% | 12.90% | +0.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.57% | 11.95% | +3.62% |
LVHD vs. BLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVHD has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than BLV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LVHD vs. BLV - Dividend Comparison
LVHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, less than BLV's 4.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLV Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF | 4.54% | 4.67% | 5.09% | 4.06% | 4.17% | 3.37% | 6.12% | 3.57% | 4.07% | 3.63% | 4.16% | 4.37% |
LVHD Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 3.20% | 3.35% | 4.23% | 3.55% | 3.30% | 2.56% | 3.27% | 3.30% | 3.82% | 3.33% | 2.48% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LVHD and BLV have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LVHD has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to BLV (2.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHD dropped -37.32% vs BLV's -38.29%.
On 10-year performance, LVHD leads with 8.26% vs 0.27% for BLV. On fees, BLV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, LVHD has performed better with a 8.26% return vs 0.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BLV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for LVHD.
BLV has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 3.20% for LVHD.
LVHD is categorized as Dividend, while BLV is Long-Term Bond. LVHD tracks Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index, while BLV tracks Bloomberg U.S. Long Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for LVHD and 0.03% for BLV.
LVHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LVHD and BLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer