FLQL vs. SCHG

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FLQL (Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - FLQL tracks the LibertyQ U.S. Large Cap Equity Index while SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLQL returned 14.80%/yr vs 13.68%/yr for SCHG. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLQL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

FLQL vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLQL achieves a 12.74% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 2.76% return.

FLQL

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 1.08%
• YTD: 12.74%
• 6M: 11.77%
• 1Y: 30.10%
• 3Y*: 22.86%
• 5Y*: 14.80%
• 10Y*: —

SCHG

• 1D: -1.24%
• 1M: -2.59%
• YTD: 2.76%
• 6M: 2.11%
• 1Y: 20.89%
• 3Y*: 22.70%
• 5Y*: 13.68%
• 10Y*: 18.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLQL vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLQL Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF	12.74%	19.64%	24.33%	23.58%	-14.83%	26.58%	10.67%	29.09%	-2.79%	15.04%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	2.76%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-1.36%	15.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FLQL and SCHG is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2017	0.83

The correlation between FLQL and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLQL vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLQL	SCHG
Technology	37.0%	46.7%
Communication Services	11.7%	15.3%
Consumer Cyclical	11.3%	12.4%
Healthcare	10.1%	8.4%
Financial Services	9.6%	6.6%
Industrials	9.5%	6.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.1%	1.6%
Real Estate	2.7%	0.5%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.3%
Utilities	1.4%	0.4%
Energy	0.9%	0.7%

Return for Risk

FLQL vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLQL

FLQL Risk / Return Rank: 74
FLQL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
FLQL Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
FLQL Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FLQL Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
FLQL Martin Ratio Rank: 81

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 33
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 35
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLQL vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLQL	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.26	1.30	+0.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.13	1.79	+1.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.23	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.34	1.28	+2.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.45	4.19	+11.27

FLQL vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLQL Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLQL and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLQL vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLQL drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQL and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLQL	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.64%	-34.59%	+0.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.05%	-16.41%	+7.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.32%	-23.39%	+4.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.41%	-34.59%	+13.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.64%	-5.16%	+4.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.03%	-5.20%	+1.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.95%	5.00%	-3.05%

Volatility

FLQL vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) is 4.61%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.78%. This indicates that FLQL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLQL	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.61%	5.78%	-1.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.87%	12.50%	-1.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.42%	16.21%	-2.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.21%	22.37%	-6.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.51%	21.61%	-4.10%

FLQL vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLQL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FLQL vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

FLQL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLQL Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF	1.01%	1.10%	1.13%	1.50%	2.07%	1.81%	1.99%	1.78%	1.82%	1.22%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.38%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLQL and SCHG in my portfolio?

FLQL and SCHG have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLQL or SCHG?

SCHG has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to FLQL (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLQL dropped -33.64% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which ETF is better, FLQL or SCHG?

On 5-year performance, FLQL leads with 14.80% vs 13.68% for SCHG. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, FLQL has been the lower-risk option at 4.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLQL or SCHG?

Over the 5-year period, FLQL has performed better with a 14.80% return vs 13.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLQL or SCHG?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FLQL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLQL or SCHG?

FLQL has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.

What is the main difference between FLQL and SCHG?

FLQL tracks LibertyQ U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FLQL and 0.04% for SCHG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLQL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.