FLQL vs. COWZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ).
FLQL and COWZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLQL is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the LibertyQ U.S. Large Cap Equity Index. It was launched on Apr 26, 2017. COWZ is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2016. Both FLQL and COWZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FLQL or COWZ.
Key characteristics
| FLQL | COWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 10.62% | 7.67% |
| 1Y Return | 28.80% | 25.93% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.86% | 10.98% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 13.24% | 16.98% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.40 | 1.96 |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.00% | 13.31% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.64% | -38.63% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.09% | -4.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLQL and COWZ is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FLQL vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FLQL achieves a 10.62% return, which is significantly higher than COWZ's 7.67% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLQL vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLQL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FLQL vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FLQL vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison
FLQL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than COWZ's 1.85% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLQL Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF | 1.29% | 1.50% | 2.07% | 1.81% | 1.99% | 1.78% | 1.82% | 1.22% | 0.00% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.85% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.95% | 0.13% |
Drawdowns
FLQL vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLQL drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, smaller than the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQL and COWZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FLQL vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) has a higher volatility of 3.96% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 3.56%. This indicates that FLQL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.