FDIS vs. FCOM
FDIS (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF) and FCOM (Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDIS is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index, while FCOM is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Telecommunication Services 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FDIS returned 13.98%/yr vs 11.60%/yr for FCOM. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.08% expense ratio.
Performance
FDIS vs. FCOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDIS achieves a 0.01% return, which is significantly higher than FCOM's -3.17% return. Over the past 10 years, FDIS has outperformed FCOM with an annualized return of 13.98%, while FCOM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.60% annualized return.
FDIS
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 2.10%
- YTD
- 0.01%
- 6M
- -1.14%
- 1Y
- 12.39%
- 3Y*
- 13.37%
- 5Y*
- 6.04%
- 10Y*
- 13.98%
FCOM
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -4.27%
- YTD
- -3.17%
- 6M
- -1.90%
- 1Y
- 16.02%
- 3Y*
- 22.19%
- 5Y*
- 6.79%
- 10Y*
- 11.60%
FDIS vs. FCOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | 0.01% | 5.67% | 24.43% | 40.48% | -35.23% | 24.25% | 49.50% | 27.44% | -0.88% | 22.96% |
FCOM Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF | -3.17% | 26.06% | 33.05% | 44.65% | -38.97% | 13.88% | 28.33% | 26.69% | -5.33% | 8.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDIS and FCOM is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013 | 0.72 |
The correlation between FDIS and FCOM shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FDIS vs. FCOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDIS
FCOM
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
Industrials
-
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
FDIS
FCOM
Consumer Defensive
FDIS
FCOM
-
Technology
FDIS
FCOM
Industrials
FDIS
FCOM
-
Communication Services
FDIS
FCOM
Healthcare
FDIS
FCOM
-
Real Estate
FDIS
FCOM
Financial Services
FDIS
FCOM
-
Basic Materials
FDIS
-
FCOM
-
Energy
FDIS
-
FCOM
-
Utilities
FDIS
-
FCOM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDIS vs. FCOM — Risk / Return Rank
FDIS
FCOM
FDIS vs. FCOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDIS | FCOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.18 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | 1.11 | -0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.24 | 4.05 | -1.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDIS vs. FCOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDIS drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, smaller than the maximum FCOM drawdown of -46.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIS and FCOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDIS | FCOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.16% | -46.76% | +7.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.50% | -13.48% | -2.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.43% | -21.16% | -6.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.16% | -46.76% | +7.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.16% | -46.76% | +7.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.58% | -6.40% | +1.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.49% | -8.66% | +1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.01% | 3.68% | +1.33% |
Volatility
FDIS vs. FCOM - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) has a higher volatility of 6.19% compared to Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) at 4.08%. This indicates that FDIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDIS | FCOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.19% | 4.08% | +2.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.44% | 11.19% | +2.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.52% | 15.43% | +3.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.92% | 21.19% | +2.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.32% | 20.96% | +1.36% |
FDIS vs. FCOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FDIS and FCOM have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FDIS vs. FCOM - Dividend Comparison
FDIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than FCOM's 0.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCOM Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF | 0.96% | 0.88% | 0.87% | 0.77% | 1.04% | 0.90% | 0.68% | 0.86% | 2.78% | 11.70% | 2.27% | 2.92% |
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | 0.73% | 0.75% | 0.69% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.58% | 0.59% | 1.14% | 1.29% | 1.00% | 1.62% | 1.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDIS and FCOM have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDIS has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to FCOM (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIS dropped -39.16% vs FCOM's -46.76%.
On 10-year performance, FDIS leads with 13.98% vs 11.60% for FCOM. Both ETFs have the same 0.08% expense ratio. On volatility, FCOM has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FDIS has performed better with a 13.98% return vs 11.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDIS and FCOM have the same expense ratio: 0.08% per year.
FCOM has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.73% for FDIS.
FDIS is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while FCOM is Large Cap Growth Equities. FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index, while FCOM tracks MSCI USA IMI Telecommunication Services 25/50 Index.
FCOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDIS and FCOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer