FCOM vs. FBMPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) and Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX).
FCOM is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Telecommunication Services 25/50 Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. FBMPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 29, 1986.
Performance
FCOM vs. FBMPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCOM vs. FBMPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCOM Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF | -6.08% | 26.06% | 33.05% | 44.65% | -38.97% | 13.88% | 28.33% | 26.69% | -5.33% | 8.20% |
FBMPX Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio | -7.53% | 37.07% | 35.98% | 56.85% | -38.30% | 15.97% | 35.48% | 33.14% | -3.52% | 12.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCOM achieves a -6.08% return, which is significantly higher than FBMPX's -7.53% return. Over the past 10 years, FCOM has underperformed FBMPX with an annualized return of 11.09%, while FBMPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.32% annualized return.
FCOM
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -5.28%
- YTD
- -6.08%
- 6M
- -1.89%
- 1Y
- 22.46%
- 3Y*
- 24.49%
- 5Y*
- 7.43%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
FBMPX
- 1D
- 4.71%
- 1M
- -7.26%
- YTD
- -7.53%
- 6M
- -4.03%
- 1Y
- 32.24%
- 3Y*
- 30.68%
- 5Y*
- 11.60%
- 10Y*
- 15.32%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCOM vs. FBMPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCOM has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FBMPX's 0.74% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCOM vs. FBMPX — Risk / Return Rank
FCOM
FBMPX
FCOM vs. FBMPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) and Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCOM | FBMPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.11 | 1.43 | -0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.73 | 2.07 | -0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.28 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 1.99 | -0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.32 | 7.51 | -1.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCOM | FBMPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 1.43 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.50 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.70 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.63 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCOM and FBMPX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCOM vs. FBMPX - Dividend Comparison
FCOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than FBMPX's 8.75% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCOM Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF | 0.99% | 0.88% | 0.87% | 0.77% | 1.04% | 0.90% | 0.68% | 0.86% | 2.78% | 11.70% | 2.27% | 2.92% |
FBMPX Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio | 8.75% | 8.09% | 7.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.88% | 3.74% | 35.43% | 15.29% | 5.53% | 7.50% | 7.29% |
Drawdowns
FCOM vs. FBMPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCOM drawdown since its inception was -46.76%, smaller than the maximum FBMPX drawdown of -61.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCOM and FBMPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCOM | FBMPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.76% | -61.77% | +15.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.48% | -16.90% | +3.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.76% | -47.42% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.76% | -47.42% | +0.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.22% | -12.99% | +3.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.74% | -10.66% | +1.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.67% | 4.47% | -0.80% |
Volatility
FCOM vs. FBMPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) is 6.45%, while Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX) has a volatility of 8.77%. This indicates that FCOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBMPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCOM | FBMPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.45% | 8.77% | -2.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.61% | 14.55% | -2.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.30% | 23.47% | -3.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.20% | 23.23% | -2.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.94% | 21.88% | -0.94% |