PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FCOM vs. FNCL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FCOM and FNCL is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

FCOM vs. FNCL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) and Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
16.16%
18.65%
FCOM
FNCL

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FCOM:

2.17

FNCL:

2.47

Sortino Ratio

FCOM:

2.86

FNCL:

3.46

Omega Ratio

FCOM:

1.38

FNCL:

1.46

Calmar Ratio

FCOM:

1.83

FNCL:

4.82

Martin Ratio

FCOM:

15.06

FNCL:

14.43

Ulcer Index

FCOM:

2.38%

FNCL:

2.65%

Daily Std Dev

FCOM:

16.51%

FNCL:

15.49%

Max Drawdown

FCOM:

-46.76%

FNCL:

-44.38%

Current Drawdown

FCOM:

-3.45%

FNCL:

-2.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCOM achieves a 1.69% return, which is significantly lower than FNCL's 4.11% return. Over the past 10 years, FCOM has underperformed FNCL with an annualized return of 10.56%, while FNCL has yielded a comparatively higher 12.28% annualized return.


FCOM

YTD

1.69%

1M

1.02%

6M

16.16%

1Y

32.25%

5Y*

10.63%

10Y*

10.56%

FNCL

YTD

4.11%

1M

5.46%

6M

18.65%

1Y

35.62%

5Y*

12.23%

10Y*

12.28%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FCOM vs. FNCL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FCOM and FNCL have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


FCOM
Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF
Expense ratio chart for FCOM: current value at 0.08% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.08%
Expense ratio chart for FNCL: current value at 0.08% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.08%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FCOM vs. FNCL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCOM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FCOM is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FCOM is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FCOM is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FCOM is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FCOM is 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FCOM is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

FNCL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FNCL is 8989
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FNCL is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FNCL is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FNCL is 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FNCL is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FNCL is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FCOM vs. FNCL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) and Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FCOM, currently valued at 2.17, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.172.47
The chart of Sortino ratio for FCOM, currently valued at 2.86, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.863.46
The chart of Omega ratio for FCOM, currently valued at 1.38, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.381.46
The chart of Calmar ratio for FCOM, currently valued at 1.83, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.834.82
The chart of Martin ratio for FCOM, currently valued at 15.06, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0015.0614.43
FCOM
FNCL

The current FCOM Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the FNCL Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCOM and FNCL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.504.004.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.17
2.47
FCOM
FNCL

Dividends

FCOM vs. FNCL - Dividend Comparison

FCOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than FNCL's 1.46% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FCOM
Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF
0.86%0.87%0.77%1.04%0.90%0.68%0.86%2.78%7.54%2.25%2.92%2.69%
FNCL
Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF
1.46%1.52%1.91%2.29%1.75%2.26%2.17%2.37%1.60%1.81%2.17%1.77%

Drawdowns

FCOM vs. FNCL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCOM drawdown since its inception was -46.76%, which is greater than FNCL's maximum drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCOM and FNCL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-3.45%
-2.08%
FCOM
FNCL

Volatility

FCOM vs. FNCL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) is 5.28%, while Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) has a volatility of 6.24%. This indicates that FCOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNCL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
5.28%
6.24%
FCOM
FNCL
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab