PortfoliosLab logo
FCOM vs. FNCL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FCOM and FNCL is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

FCOM vs. FNCL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) and Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FCOM:

0.96

FNCL:

1.16

Sortino Ratio

FCOM:

1.39

FNCL:

1.65

Omega Ratio

FCOM:

1.20

FNCL:

1.24

Calmar Ratio

FCOM:

0.93

FNCL:

1.41

Martin Ratio

FCOM:

3.14

FNCL:

5.16

Ulcer Index

FCOM:

6.27%

FNCL:

4.72%

Daily Std Dev

FCOM:

21.02%

FNCL:

21.35%

Max Drawdown

FCOM:

-46.76%

FNCL:

-44.38%

Current Drawdown

FCOM:

-7.20%

FNCL:

-2.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCOM achieves a 1.39% return, which is significantly lower than FNCL's 5.10% return. Over the past 10 years, FCOM has underperformed FNCL with an annualized return of 10.19%, while FNCL has yielded a comparatively higher 11.79% annualized return.


FCOM

YTD

1.39%

1M

10.83%

6M

1.32%

1Y

20.08%

5Y*

13.55%

10Y*

10.19%

FNCL

YTD

5.10%

1M

11.08%

6M

2.00%

1Y

24.69%

5Y*

21.77%

10Y*

11.79%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FCOM vs. FNCL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FCOM and FNCL have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FCOM vs. FNCL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCOM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FCOM is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FCOM is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FCOM is 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FCOM is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FCOM is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FCOM is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FNCL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FNCL is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FNCL is 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FNCL is 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FNCL is 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FNCL is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FNCL is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FCOM vs. FNCL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) and Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FCOM Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is comparable to the FNCL Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCOM and FNCL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

FCOM vs. FNCL - Dividend Comparison

FCOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than FNCL's 1.51% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FCOM
Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF
0.91%0.87%0.77%1.04%0.90%0.68%0.86%2.78%7.54%2.25%2.92%2.69%
FNCL
Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF
1.51%1.52%1.91%2.29%1.75%2.26%2.17%2.37%1.60%1.26%2.17%1.77%

Drawdowns

FCOM vs. FNCL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCOM drawdown since its inception was -46.76%, which is greater than FNCL's maximum drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCOM and FNCL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FCOM vs. FNCL - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) has a higher volatility of 6.26% compared to Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) at 5.76%. This indicates that FCOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNCL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...