FDIS vs. IYC
FDIS (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF) and IYC (iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - FDIS tracks the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index while IYC tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FDIS returned 13.99%/yr vs 11.83%/yr for IYC. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FDIS charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for IYC.
Performance
FDIS vs. IYC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDIS achieves a -1.40% return, which is significantly higher than IYC's -3.16% return. Over the past 10 years, FDIS has outperformed IYC with an annualized return of 13.99%, while IYC has yielded a comparatively lower 11.83% annualized return.
FDIS
- 1D
- -1.74%
- 1M
- -1.89%
- YTD
- -1.40%
- 6M
- -3.81%
- 1Y
- 11.16%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- 5.44%
- 10Y*
- 13.99%
IYC
- 1D
- -1.71%
- 1M
- -2.38%
- YTD
- -3.16%
- 6M
- -4.48%
- 1Y
- 4.43%
- 3Y*
- 13.60%
- 5Y*
- 5.92%
- 10Y*
- 11.83%
FDIS vs. IYC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | -1.40% | 5.67% | 24.43% | 40.48% | -35.23% | 24.25% | 49.50% | 27.44% | -0.88% | 22.96% |
IYC iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF | -3.16% | 7.85% | 27.54% | 34.03% | -31.78% | 19.65% | 24.58% | 27.36% | 1.76% | 19.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDIS and IYC is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013 | 0.96 |
The correlation between FDIS and IYC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDIS vs. IYC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDIS
IYC
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
FDIS
IYC
Consumer Defensive
FDIS
IYC
Technology
FDIS
IYC
Industrials
FDIS
IYC
Communication Services
FDIS
IYC
Healthcare
FDIS
IYC
-
Real Estate
FDIS
IYC
-
Financial Services
FDIS
IYC
-
Basic Materials
FDIS
-
IYC
-
Energy
FDIS
-
IYC
Utilities
FDIS
-
IYC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDIS vs. IYC — Risk / Return Rank
FDIS
IYC
FDIS vs. IYC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDIS | IYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.06 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | 0.37 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.21 | 1.07 | +1.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDIS vs. IYC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDIS drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, smaller than the maximum IYC drawdown of -53.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIS and IYC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDIS | IYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.16% | -53.10% | +13.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.50% | -11.97% | -3.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.43% | -21.62% | -5.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.16% | -35.90% | -3.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.16% | -35.90% | -3.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.93% | -6.81% | +0.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.49% | -9.94% | +2.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.05% | 4.15% | +0.90% |
Volatility
FDIS vs. IYC - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) has a higher volatility of 6.33% compared to iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) at 4.94%. This indicates that FDIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDIS | IYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.33% | 4.94% | +1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.87% | 11.21% | +2.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.76% | 14.68% | +4.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.98% | 20.80% | +3.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.36% | 19.94% | +2.42% |
FDIS vs. IYC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDIS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than IYC's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDIS vs. IYC - Dividend Comparison
FDIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than IYC's 0.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | 0.74% | 0.75% | 0.69% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.58% | 0.59% | 1.14% | 1.29% | 1.00% | 1.62% | 1.25% |
IYC iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.51% | 0.51% | 0.47% | 0.68% | 0.68% | 0.39% | 0.65% | 0.89% | 0.90% | 0.92% | 1.10% | 1.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, FDIS and IYC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FDIS has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to IYC (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIS dropped -39.16% vs IYC's -53.10%.
On 10-year performance, FDIS leads with 13.99% vs 11.83% for IYC. On fees, FDIS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, IYC has been the lower-risk option at 4.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FDIS has performed better with a 13.99% return vs 11.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDIS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IYC.
FDIS has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.51% for IYC.
FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index, while IYC tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FDIS and 0.38% for IYC.
FDIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDIS and IYC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer