PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDIS vs. IYC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDIS vs. IYC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDIS achieves a -1.40% return, which is significantly higher than IYC's -3.16% return. Over the past 10 years, FDIS has outperformed IYC with an annualized return of 13.99%, while IYC has yielded a comparatively lower 11.83% annualized return.


FDIS

1D
-1.74%
1M
-1.89%
YTD
-1.40%
6M
-3.81%
1Y
11.16%
3Y*
12.93%
5Y*
5.44%
10Y*
13.99%

IYC

1D
-1.71%
1M
-2.38%
YTD
-3.16%
6M
-4.48%
1Y
4.43%
3Y*
13.60%
5Y*
5.92%
10Y*
11.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDIS vs. IYC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
-1.40%5.67%24.43%40.48%-35.23%24.25%49.50%27.44%-0.88%22.96%
IYC
iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF
-3.16%7.85%27.54%34.03%-31.78%19.65%24.58%27.36%1.76%19.87%

Correlation

The correlation between FDIS and IYC is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.96

The correlation between FDIS and IYC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDIS vs. IYC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDIS
IYC

Consumer Cyclical

96.7%
67.8%

Consumer Defensive

1.1%
11.2%

Technology

1.0%
3.8%

Industrials

0.9%
3.6%

Communication Services

0.3%
13.4%

Healthcare

0.1%

-

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Financial Services

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Energy

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

FDIS
96.7%
IYC
67.8%

Consumer Defensive

FDIS
1.1%
IYC
11.2%

Technology

FDIS
1.0%
IYC
3.8%

Industrials

FDIS
0.9%
IYC
3.6%

Communication Services

FDIS
0.3%
IYC
13.4%

Healthcare

FDIS
0.1%
IYC

-

Real Estate

FDIS
0.1%
IYC

-

Financial Services

FDIS
0.1%
IYC

-

Basic Materials

FDIS

-

IYC

-

Energy

FDIS

-

IYC
0.1%

Utilities

FDIS

-

IYC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDIS vs. IYC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDIS
FDIS Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FDIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIS Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIS Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

IYC
IYC Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
IYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYC Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
IYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYC Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDIS vs. IYC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDISIYCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.06

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

0.37

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.21

1.07

+1.14

FDIS vs. IYC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDIS Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is higher than the IYC Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDIS and IYC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDIS vs. IYC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDIS drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, smaller than the maximum IYC drawdown of -53.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIS and IYC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDISIYCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.16%

-53.10%

+13.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.50%

-11.97%

-3.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.43%

-21.62%

-5.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.16%

-35.90%

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.16%

-35.90%

-3.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.93%

-6.81%

+0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.49%

-9.94%

+2.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.05%

4.15%

+0.90%

Volatility

FDIS vs. IYC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) has a higher volatility of 6.33% compared to iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) at 4.94%. This indicates that FDIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDISIYCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.33%

4.94%

+1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.87%

11.21%

+2.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.76%

14.68%

+4.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.98%

20.80%

+3.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.36%

19.94%

+2.42%

FDIS vs. IYC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDIS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than IYC's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDIS vs. IYC - Dividend Comparison

FDIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than IYC's 0.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.74%0.75%0.69%0.78%1.00%0.58%0.59%1.14%1.29%1.00%1.62%1.25%
IYC
iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.51%0.51%0.47%0.68%0.68%0.39%0.65%0.89%0.90%0.92%1.10%1.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FDIS and IYC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDIS has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to IYC (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIS dropped -39.16% vs IYC's -53.10%.

On 10-year performance, FDIS leads with 13.99% vs 11.83% for IYC. On fees, FDIS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, IYC has been the lower-risk option at 4.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDIS has performed better with a 13.99% return vs 11.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDIS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IYC.

FDIS has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.51% for IYC.

FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index, while IYC tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FDIS and 0.38% for IYC.

FDIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDIS and IYC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer