FCOM vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
FCOM and VOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FCOM is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Telecommunication Services 25/50 Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010. Both FCOM and VOO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FCOM or VOO.
Correlation
The correlation between FCOM and VOO is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FCOM vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FCOM:
2.23
VOO:
2.04
FCOM:
2.92
VOO:
2.72
FCOM:
1.40
VOO:
1.38
FCOM:
1.68
VOO:
3.02
FCOM:
17.03
VOO:
13.60
FCOM:
2.13%
VOO:
1.88%
FCOM:
16.30%
VOO:
12.52%
FCOM:
-46.76%
VOO:
-33.99%
FCOM:
-4.36%
VOO:
-3.52%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCOM achieves a 34.01% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 24.65% return. Over the past 10 years, FCOM has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 10.66%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.02% annualized return.
FCOM
34.01%
2.88%
16.52%
34.60%
11.49%
10.66%
VOO
24.65%
-0.29%
7.63%
24.77%
14.57%
13.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCOM vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCOM has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FCOM vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FCOM vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
FCOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than VOO's 1.26% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCOM Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF | 0.64% | 0.77% | 1.04% | 0.90% | 0.68% | 0.86% | 2.78% | 7.54% | 2.25% | 2.92% | 2.69% | 0.25% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 0.92% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% | 1.85% | 1.84% |
Drawdowns
FCOM vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCOM drawdown since its inception was -46.76%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCOM and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FCOM vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) has a higher volatility of 5.20% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.58%. This indicates that FCOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.