PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FDIS vs. BETZ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FDIS and BETZ is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

FDIS vs. BETZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%120.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
102.61%
20.89%
FDIS
BETZ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FDIS:

1.51

BETZ:

0.67

Sortino Ratio

FDIS:

2.04

BETZ:

1.05

Omega Ratio

FDIS:

1.26

BETZ:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

FDIS:

1.71

BETZ:

0.25

Martin Ratio

FDIS:

7.79

BETZ:

2.40

Ulcer Index

FDIS:

3.53%

BETZ:

5.31%

Daily Std Dev

FDIS:

18.21%

BETZ:

19.13%

Max Drawdown

FDIS:

-39.16%

BETZ:

-60.82%

Current Drawdown

FDIS:

-4.56%

BETZ:

-40.86%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDIS achieves a 26.80% return, which is significantly higher than BETZ's 11.53% return.


FDIS

YTD

26.80%

1M

5.89%

6M

23.25%

1Y

25.57%

5Y*

16.66%

10Y*

14.27%

BETZ

YTD

11.53%

1M

-2.37%

6M

12.90%

1Y

11.92%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FDIS vs. BETZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDIS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than BETZ's 0.75% expense ratio.


BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
Expense ratio chart for BETZ: current value at 0.75% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.75%
Expense ratio chart for FDIS: current value at 0.08% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.08%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FDIS vs. BETZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FDIS, currently valued at 1.51, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.510.67
The chart of Sortino ratio for FDIS, currently valued at 2.04, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.002.041.05
The chart of Omega ratio for FDIS, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.261.13
The chart of Calmar ratio for FDIS, currently valued at 1.71, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.710.25
The chart of Martin ratio for FDIS, currently valued at 7.79, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.007.792.40
FDIS
BETZ

The current FDIS Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the BETZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDIS and BETZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.51
0.67
FDIS
BETZ

Dividends

FDIS vs. BETZ - Dividend Comparison

FDIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, while BETZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.68%0.78%1.00%0.58%0.59%1.14%1.29%1.00%1.62%1.25%1.01%0.28%
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
0.00%0.00%0.66%0.00%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FDIS vs. BETZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDIS drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, smaller than the maximum BETZ drawdown of -60.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIS and BETZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-4.56%
-40.86%
FDIS
BETZ

Volatility

FDIS vs. BETZ - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) has a higher volatility of 6.56% compared to Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) at 5.43%. This indicates that FDIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BETZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
6.56%
5.43%
FDIS
BETZ
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab