FCOM vs. FTEC
FCOM (Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF) and FTEC (Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCOM is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Communication Services 25/50 Index, while FTEC is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FCOM returned 11.09%/yr vs 25.28%/yr for FTEC. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCOM charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FTEC.
Performance
FCOM vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCOM achieves a -5.47% return, which is significantly lower than FTEC's 23.56% return. Over the past 10 years, FCOM has underperformed FTEC with an annualized return of 11.09%, while FTEC has yielded a comparatively higher 25.28% annualized return.
FCOM
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -6.44%
- YTD
- -5.47%
- 6M
- -5.56%
- 1Y
- 12.42%
- 3Y*
- 21.58%
- 5Y*
- 5.87%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
FTEC
- 1D
- -3.70%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 23.56%
- 6M
- 21.69%
- 1Y
- 47.58%
- 3Y*
- 30.58%
- 5Y*
- 19.77%
- 10Y*
- 25.28%
FCOM vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCOM Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF | -5.47% | 26.06% | 33.05% | 44.65% | -38.97% | 13.88% | 28.33% | 26.69% | -5.33% | 8.20% |
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 23.56% | 22.11% | 29.40% | 53.30% | -29.59% | 30.49% | 45.83% | 48.93% | -0.39% | 36.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCOM and FTEC is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013 | 0.68 |
The correlation between FCOM and FTEC shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FCOM vs. FTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FCOM
FTEC
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
FCOM
FTEC
Technology
FCOM
FTEC
Consumer Cyclical
FCOM
FTEC
Real Estate
FCOM
FTEC
-
Basic Materials
FCOM
-
FTEC
Consumer Defensive
FCOM
-
FTEC
-
Energy
FCOM
-
FTEC
Financial Services
FCOM
-
FTEC
Healthcare
FCOM
-
FTEC
-
Industrials
FCOM
-
FTEC
Utilities
FCOM
-
FTEC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCOM vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank
FCOM
FTEC
FCOM vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCOM | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.35 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 2.94 | -2.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.25 | 9.03 | -5.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCOM vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCOM drawdown since its inception was -46.76%, which is greater than FTEC's maximum drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCOM and FTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCOM | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.76% | -34.95% | -11.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.48% | -16.26% | +2.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.16% | -27.30% | +6.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.76% | -34.95% | -11.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.76% | -34.95% | -11.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.62% | -7.72% | -0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.65% | -5.57% | -3.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.83% | 5.28% | -1.45% |
Volatility
FCOM vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) is 5.56%, while Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) has a volatility of 11.42%. This indicates that FCOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCOM | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.56% | 11.42% | -5.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.83% | 18.65% | -6.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.76% | 22.79% | -7.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.27% | 25.60% | -4.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.00% | 24.86% | -3.86% |
FCOM vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCOM has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FCOM vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison
FCOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than FTEC's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCOM Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF | 1.02% | 0.88% | 0.87% | 0.77% | 1.04% | 0.90% | 0.68% | 0.86% | 2.78% | 11.70% | 2.27% | 2.92% |
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 0.36% | 0.43% | 0.49% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.63% | 0.83% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 0.96% | 1.25% | 1.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCOM and FTEC have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTEC has higher volatility (11.42%) compared to FCOM (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCOM dropped -46.76% vs FTEC's -34.95%.
On 10-year performance, FTEC leads with 25.28% vs 11.09% for FCOM. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FCOM has been the lower-risk option at 5.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FTEC has performed better with a 25.28% return vs 11.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for FCOM.
FCOM has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.36% for FTEC.
FCOM is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FTEC is Technology Equities. FCOM tracks MSCI USA IMI Communication Services 25/50 Index, while FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FCOM and 0.08% for FTEC.
FTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCOM and FTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer