FDIS vs. XRT
FDIS (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF) and XRT (SPDR S&P Retail ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - FDIS tracks the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index while XRT tracks the S&P Retail Select Industry. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FDIS returned 13.99%/yr vs 9.22%/yr for XRT. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDIS charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XRT.
Performance
FDIS vs. XRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDIS achieves a -1.40% return, which is significantly lower than XRT's 0.75% return. Over the past 10 years, FDIS has outperformed XRT with an annualized return of 13.99%, while XRT has yielded a comparatively lower 9.22% annualized return.
FDIS
- 1D
- -1.74%
- 1M
- -1.89%
- YTD
- -1.40%
- 6M
- -3.81%
- 1Y
- 11.16%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- 5.44%
- 10Y*
- 13.99%
XRT
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 3.82%
- YTD
- 0.75%
- 6M
- -1.40%
- 1Y
- 12.23%
- 3Y*
- 12.77%
- 5Y*
- -0.81%
- 10Y*
- 9.22%
FDIS vs. XRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | -1.40% | 5.67% | 24.43% | 40.48% | -35.23% | 24.25% | 49.50% | 27.44% | -0.88% | 22.96% |
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF | 0.75% | 8.07% | 11.78% | 21.53% | -31.64% | 42.60% | 41.91% | 14.12% | -8.04% | 4.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDIS and XRT is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013 | 0.77 |
The correlation between FDIS and XRT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDIS vs. XRT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDIS
XRT
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Industrials
-
Communication Services
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
FDIS
XRT
Consumer Defensive
FDIS
XRT
Technology
FDIS
XRT
Industrials
FDIS
XRT
-
Communication Services
FDIS
XRT
Healthcare
FDIS
XRT
Real Estate
FDIS
XRT
-
Financial Services
FDIS
XRT
-
Basic Materials
FDIS
-
XRT
-
Energy
FDIS
-
XRT
Utilities
FDIS
-
XRT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDIS vs. XRT — Risk / Return Rank
FDIS
XRT
FDIS vs. XRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDIS | XRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.11 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | 0.91 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.21 | 2.06 | +0.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDIS vs. XRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDIS drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, smaller than the maximum XRT drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIS and XRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDIS | XRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.16% | -65.81% | +26.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.50% | -13.53% | -1.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.43% | -25.62% | -1.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.16% | -44.57% | +5.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.16% | -47.02% | +7.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.93% | -11.42% | +5.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.49% | -14.99% | +7.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.05% | 5.96% | -0.91% |
Volatility
FDIS vs. XRT - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) have volatilities of 6.33% and 6.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDIS | XRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.33% | 6.41% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.87% | 14.33% | -0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.76% | 20.64% | -1.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.98% | 26.93% | -2.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.36% | 27.20% | -4.84% |
FDIS vs. XRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDIS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XRT's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDIS vs. XRT - Dividend Comparison
FDIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than XRT's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | 0.74% | 0.75% | 0.69% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.58% | 0.59% | 1.14% | 1.29% | 1.00% | 1.62% | 1.25% |
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF | 1.03% | 0.77% | 1.52% | 1.40% | 2.15% | 1.55% | 1.01% | 1.57% | 1.51% | 1.52% | 1.36% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDIS and XRT have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XRT has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to FDIS (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIS dropped -39.16% vs XRT's -65.81%.
On 10-year performance, FDIS leads with 13.99% vs 9.22% for XRT. On fees, FDIS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FDIS has performed better with a 13.99% return vs 9.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDIS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XRT.
XRT has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.74% for FDIS.
FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index, while XRT tracks S&P Retail Select Industry. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FDIS and 0.35% for XRT.
FDIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDIS and XRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer