FCOM vs. IXP
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) and iShares Global Comm Services ETF (IXP).
FCOM and IXP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FCOM is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Telecommunication Services 25/50 Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. IXP is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global 1200 Communication Services 4.5/22.5/45 Capped. It was launched on Nov 12, 2001. Both FCOM and IXP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FCOM or IXP.
Performance
FCOM vs. IXP - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCOM achieves a 31.75% return, which is significantly higher than IXP's 29.99% return. Over the past 10 years, FCOM has outperformed IXP with an annualized return of 10.18%, while IXP has yielded a comparatively lower 6.78% annualized return.
FCOM
31.75%
5.07%
15.82%
37.90%
11.91%
10.18%
IXP
29.99%
3.11%
11.75%
33.50%
11.52%
6.78%
Key characteristics
| FCOM | IXP | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.34 | 2.24 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.13 | 3.08 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.42 | 1.40 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.47 | 1.75 |
| Martin Ratio | 17.50 | 14.01 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.13% | 2.34% |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.88% | 14.61% |
| Max Drawdown | -46.76% | -50.13% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.04% | -1.02% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCOM vs. IXP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCOM has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than IXP's 0.43% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between FCOM and IXP is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FCOM vs. IXP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) and iShares Global Comm Services ETF (IXP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FCOM vs. IXP - Dividend Comparison
FCOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than IXP's 0.95% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCOM Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF | 0.83% | 0.77% | 1.04% | 0.90% | 0.68% | 0.86% | 2.78% | 7.54% | 2.25% | 2.92% | 2.69% | 0.25% |
IXP iShares Global Comm Services ETF | 0.95% | 1.24% | 1.43% | 1.80% | 0.95% | 2.18% | 4.32% | 3.40% | 4.02% | 3.89% | 12.39% | 3.40% |
Drawdowns
FCOM vs. IXP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCOM drawdown since its inception was -46.76%, smaller than the maximum IXP drawdown of -50.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCOM and IXP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FCOM vs. IXP - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) has a higher volatility of 4.66% compared to iShares Global Comm Services ETF (IXP) at 3.98%. This indicates that FCOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IXP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.