FDIS vs. XLY

Last updated Jun 21, 2026

FDIS (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF) and XLY (Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - FDIS tracks the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index while XLY tracks the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FDIS returned 13.85%/yr vs 12.68%/yr for XLY. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FDIS charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for XLY.

Performance

FDIS vs. XLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDIS achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly higher than XLY's -1.69% return. Over the past 10 years, FDIS has outperformed XLY with an annualized return of 13.85%, while XLY has yielded a comparatively lower 12.68% annualized return.

FDIS

• 1D: 1.73%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 0.35%
• 6M: -1.53%
• 1Y: 13.13%
• 3Y*: 13.40%
• 5Y*: 6.37%
• 10Y*: 13.85%

XLY

• 1D: 1.45%
• 1M: -1.30%
• YTD: -1.69%
• 6M: -3.47%
• 1Y: 12.10%
• 3Y*: 13.01%
• 5Y*: 7.23%
• 10Y*: 12.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDIS vs. XLY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF	0.35%	5.67%	24.43%	40.48%	-35.23%	24.25%	49.50%	27.44%	-0.88%	22.96%
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund	-1.69%	7.37%	26.51%	39.64%	-36.27%	27.93%	29.63%	28.39%	1.58%	22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between FDIS and XLY is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013	0.98

The correlation between FDIS and XLY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDIS vs. XLY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDIS	XLY
Consumer Cyclical	96.7%	97.3%
Consumer Defensive	1.1%	-
Technology	1.0%	0.9%
Industrials	0.9%	0.1%
Communication Services	0.3%	1.5%
Healthcare	0.1%	-
Real Estate	0.1%	-
Financial Services	0.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Energy	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FDIS vs. XLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDIS

FDIS Risk / Return Rank: 20
FDIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
FDIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
FDIS Omega Ratio Rank: 19
FDIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
FDIS Martin Ratio Rank: 22

XLY

XLY Risk / Return Rank: 19
XLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
XLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
XLY Omega Ratio Rank: 19
XLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
XLY Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDIS vs. XLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDIS	XLY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.70	0.67	+0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.10	1.05	+0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.12	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.85	0.82	+0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.60	2.49	+0.11

FDIS vs. XLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDIS Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is comparable to the XLY Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDIS and XLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDIS vs. XLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDIS drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, smaller than the maximum XLY drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIS and XLY.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDIS	XLY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.16%	-59.05%	+19.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.50%	-14.98%	-0.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.43%	-26.01%	-1.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.16%	-39.67%	+0.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.16%	-39.67%	+0.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.26%	-5.72%	+1.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.49%	-9.55%	+2.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.04%	4.92%	+0.12%

Volatility

FDIS vs. XLY - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) have volatilities of 6.56% and 6.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDIS	XLY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.56%	6.74%	-0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.80%	13.82%	-0.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.64%	18.43%	+0.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.97%	23.89%	+0.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.34%	22.10%	+0.24%

FDIS vs. XLY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDIS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XLY's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FDIS vs. XLY - Dividend Comparison

FDIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, more than XLY's 0.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF	0.73%	0.75%	0.69%	0.78%	1.00%	0.58%	0.59%	1.14%	1.29%	1.00%	1.62%	1.25%
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund	0.76%	0.79%	0.72%	0.78%	1.00%	0.53%	0.82%	1.28%	1.34%	1.20%	1.71%	1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDIS and XLY in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, FDIS and XLY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FDIS or XLY?

XLY has higher volatility (6.74%) compared to FDIS (6.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIS dropped -39.16% vs XLY's -59.05%.

Which ETF is better, FDIS or XLY?

On 10-year performance, FDIS leads with 13.85% vs 12.68% for XLY. On fees, FDIS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FDIS has been the lower-risk option at 6.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDIS or XLY?

Over the 10-year period, FDIS has performed better with a 13.85% return vs 12.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDIS or XLY?

FDIS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for XLY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDIS or XLY?

XLY has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.73% for FDIS.

What is the main difference between FDIS and XLY?

FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index, while XLY tracks Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FDIS and 0.13% for XLY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.