PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDIS vs. IEDI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDIS vs. IEDI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and iShares Evolved U.S. Discretionary Spending ETF (IEDI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDIS achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly lower than IEDI's 2.21% return.


FDIS

1D
2.63%
1M
-1.18%
6M
-1.58%
YTD
-0.23%
1Y
9.49%
3Y*
11.49%
5Y*
5.36%
10Y*
13.50%
ALL TIME*
12.48%

IEDI

1D
0.85%
1M
0.80%
6M
-1.37%
YTD
2.21%
1Y
3.39%
3Y*
11.75%
5Y*
5.87%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.73M$7.77M$9.21M
$107.90K$120.57K$143.23K

FDIS vs. IEDI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
-0.23%5.67%24.43%40.48%-35.23%24.25%49.50%27.44%-3.42%
IEDI
iShares Evolved U.S. Discretionary Spending ETF
2.21%4.05%22.11%24.32%-23.17%21.19%29.83%31.07%0.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FDIS and IEDI is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2018

0.86

The correlation between FDIS and IEDI shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDIS vs. IEDI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDIS
IEDI

Consumer Cyclical

96.2%
62.9%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%
23.1%

Industrials

1.1%
4.0%

Technology

1.0%
3.1%

Communication Services

0.3%
2.9%

Healthcare

0.1%
0.2%

Real Estate

0.1%
0.5%

Financial Services

0.1%
2.2%

Basic Materials

-

0.1%

Energy

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

FDIS
96.2%
IEDI
62.9%

Consumer Defensive

FDIS
1.2%
IEDI
23.1%

Industrials

FDIS
1.1%
IEDI
4.0%

Technology

FDIS
1.0%
IEDI
3.1%

Communication Services

FDIS
0.3%
IEDI
2.9%

Healthcare

FDIS
0.1%
IEDI
0.2%

Real Estate

FDIS
0.1%
IEDI
0.5%

Financial Services

FDIS
0.1%
IEDI
2.2%

Basic Materials

FDIS

-

IEDI
0.1%

Energy

FDIS

-

IEDI
0.1%

Utilities

FDIS

-

IEDI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDIS vs. IEDI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDIS
FDIS Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FDIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIS Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIS Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

IEDI
IEDI Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
IEDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEDI Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
IEDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEDI Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDIS vs. IEDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and iShares Evolved U.S. Discretionary Spending ETF (IEDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDISIEDIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.04

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

0.29

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.24

0.62

+0.61

FDIS vs. IEDI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDIS Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is higher than the IEDI Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDIS and IEDI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDIS vs. IEDI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDIS drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, which is greater than IEDI's maximum drawdown of -30.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIS and IEDI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDISIEDIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.16%

-30.60%

-8.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.50%

-9.44%

-6.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.43%

-18.64%

-8.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.16%

-29.79%

-9.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.81%

-3.77%

-1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.47%

-6.90%

-0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.36%

4.44%

+0.92%

Volatility

FDIS vs. IEDI - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) has a higher volatility of 6.64% compared to iShares Evolved U.S. Discretionary Spending ETF (IEDI) at 4.93%. This indicates that FDIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEDI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDISIEDIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.64%

4.93%

+1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.66%

11.15%

+3.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.43%

14.29%

+5.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.09%

18.32%

+5.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.39%

19.39%

+3.00%

FDIS vs. IEDI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDIS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than IEDI's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FDIS vs. IEDI - Dividend Comparison

FDIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than IEDI's 0.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.73%0.75%0.69%0.78%1.00%0.58%0.59%1.14%1.29%1.00%1.62%1.25%
IEDI
iShares Evolved U.S. Discretionary Spending ETF
0.94%0.95%0.90%1.13%3.38%0.70%0.83%2.07%1.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDIS and IEDI have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDIS has higher volatility (6.64%) compared to IEDI (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIS dropped -39.16% vs IEDI's -30.60%.

On 5-year performance, IEDI leads with 5.87% vs 5.36% for FDIS. On fees, FDIS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, IEDI has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IEDI has performed better with a 5.87% return vs 5.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDIS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IEDI.

IEDI has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.73% for FDIS.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FDIS and 0.18% for IEDI.

FDIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.34 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDIS and IEDI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer